Access to Information Orders
Decision Information
NATURE OF THE APPEAL: The Town of Dryden (the Town) received a request under the MunicipalFreedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act ) foraccess to copies of payments to or invoices received from any security agenciesfrom July 1, 1997 to the date of the search and any records relating to actualor anticipated security costs in respect of the Dryden Telephone Company strike. The requester is a union representing the employees of the telephone companywho were on strike at the time of the request. The Town advised the requester that no responsive records exist. Therequester (now the appellant) appealed the Town's decision. This office sent a Notice of Inquiry to the Town and the appellant. Representations were received from the Town only. Where a requester provides sufficient details about the records which he isseeking, it is my responsibility to ensure that the Town has made a reasonablesearch to identify any records which are responsive to the request. The Act does not require the Town to prove with absolute certainty that the requestedrecords do not exist. However, in order to properly discharge its obligationsunder the Act , the Town must provide me with sufficient evidence to showthat it has made a reasonable effort to identify and locaterecords responsive to the appellant's request. The Town states that because the request was made one day after the start ofthe strike, all the arrangements for security guards at that time had been madeverbally. I have not received any representations from the appellant. In myview, the explanation provided by the Town indicates that it conducted areasonable search for responsive records in the circumstances. Therefore, Ifind that the Town has conducted a reasonable search to locate the informationwhich might exist as of the date of the request which is the subject of thisappeal. ORDER: I dismiss the appeal. Original signed by: Marianne Miller, Inquiry Officer November 25, 1997
Decision Content
NATURE OF THE APPEAL:
The Town of Dryden (the Town) received a request under the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the Act) for access to copies of payments to or invoices received from any security agencies from July 1, 1997 to the date of the search and any records relating to actual or anticipated security costs in respect of the Dryden Telephone Company strike. The requester is a union representing the employees of the telephone company who were on strike at the time of the request.
The Town advised the requester that no responsive records exist. The requester (now the appellant) appealed the Town’s decision.
This office sent a Notice of Inquiry to the Town and the appellant. Representations were received from the Town only.
Where a requester provides sufficient details about the records which he is seeking, it is my responsibility to ensure that the Town has made a reasonable search to identify any records which are responsive to the request. The Act does not require the Town to prove with absolute certainty that the requested records do not exist. However, in order to properly discharge its obligations under the Act, the Town must provide me with sufficient evidence to show that it has made a reasonable effort to identify and locate records responsive to the appellant’s request.
The Town states that because the request was made one day after the start of the strike, all the arrangements for security guards at that time had been made verbally. I have not received any representations from the appellant. In my view, the explanation provided by the Town indicates that it conducted a reasonable search for responsive records in the circumstances. Therefore, I find that the Town has conducted a reasonable search to locate the information which might exist as of the date of the request which is the subject of this appeal.
ORDER:
I dismiss the appeal.
Original signed by: November 25, 1997
Marianne Miller
Inquiry Officer