Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20130911


Dockets:

A-429-12

A-428-12

 

Citation: 2013 FCA 207

 

CORAM:      

NOËL J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.A.

 

Docket:

A-429-12

 

BETWEEN:

ROBERT LAVIGNE

 

Appellant

and

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

CANADA POST CORPORATION

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

Respondents

Docket:

A-428-12

 

BETWEEN:

ROBERT LAVIGNE

 

Appellant

and

CANADA POST CORPORATION

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

Respondents

 

Heard at Montréal, Quebec, on September 11, 2013.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 11, 2013.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                  NOËL J.A.

 


Date: 20130911


Dockets:

A-429-12

A-428-12

 

Citation: 2013 FCA 207

CORAM:      

NOËL J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.A.

 

Docket:

A-429-12

 

BETWEEN:

ROBERT LAVIGNE

 

Appellant

and

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

CANADA POST CORPORATION

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

Respondents

Docket:

A-428-12

 

AND BETWEEN:

ROBERT LAVIGNE

 

Appellant

and

CANADA POST CORPORATION

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

Respondents

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 11, 2013).

NOËL J.A.

[1]               These are two consolidated appeals from orders of the Federal Court wherein Martineau J. (the Federal Court judge) dismissed the appellant’s motion to set aside an earlier order issued by Prothonotary Morneau (the Prothonotary) dismissing the actions brought by Robert Lavigne (the appellant) in Federal Court files T‑105‑10 and T‑107‑10 for delay following a status review.

 

[2]               The two appeals were consolidated by order of this Court issued on December 12, 2012. The reasons which follow dispose of both appeals, the original being filed in file A‑429‑12 and a copy thereof in file A‑428‑12.

 

[3]               The appellant seeks to have the order of the Federal Court judge overturned on a variety of grounds.

 

[4]               We are satisfied that there has been no misuse of judicial discretion on the part of the Prothonotary and that the Federal Court judge properly declined to intervene. We are also satisfied that given the background to this case, the Federal Court judge committed no error in proceeding on the basis that the order of the Prothonotary applies to the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

 

[5]               The appeals will be dismissed with one set of costs in file A‑429‑12.

 

 

 

"Marc Noël"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 


Dockets:

                                                                                                A-429-12 AND A-428-12

(APPEALS FROM ORDERS OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2012, DOCKETS NOS. T-105-10 AND T-107-10)

 

DOCKET:

A-429-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

ROBERT LAVIGNE v. CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, CANADA POST CORPORATION, THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

AND DOCKET:

A-428-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

ROBERT LAVIGNE v. CANADA POST CORPORATION, THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

                                                                                                Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:

                                                                                                September 11, 2013

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:  

NOËL J.A.

TRUDEL J.A.

MAINVILLE J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

                                                                                                NOËL J.A.

APPEARANCES:

Robert Lavigne

 

For The Appellant

(ON HIS OWN BEHALF)

 

Caroline Laverdière

 

For The Respondent

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

 

Alexandre Bourbonnais

 

For The Respondent

CANADA POST CORPORATION

 

Nicolas Charron

 

For The Respondent

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

William F. Pentney

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 

For The Respondent

CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

 

NORTON ROSE CANADA LLP

Montréal, Quebec

 

For The Respondent

CANADA POST CORPORATION

 

PHILION LEBLANC BEAUDRY

Montréal, Quebec

 

For The Respondent

THE CANADIAN UNION OF POSTAL WORKERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.