Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Canada v. Turbide

Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date 2011-11-22
Neutral citation 2011 FCA 324
File numbers A-356-11

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d’appel fédérale

 

Date: 20111122

Docket: A‑356‑11

Citation: 2011 FCA 324

 

Present: NOËL J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

SERGE TURBIDE

Respondent

 

 

 

Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.

 

Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on November 22, 2011.

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                                                                           NOËL J.A.

 

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d’appel fédérale

 

Date: 20111122

Docket: A‑356‑11

Citation: 2011 FCA 324

 

Present: NOËL J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

SERGE TURBIDE

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER

NOËL J.A.

 

[1]               The appellant is moving for a stay of her appeal pending the Supreme Court’s decision in the appeal of Canada v. Craig, 2011 FCA 22, [2011] F.C.J. No. 435. The respondent objects to this motion. The appeal must be heard in March 2012. It is likely that the Supreme Court’s dismissal of that appeal, as the case may be, will put an end to this dispute (Appellant’s Reasons, paragraph 14; Respondent’s Reasons, paragraph 15) and, in any event, the final outcome of this dispute will necessarily be dictated by the forthcoming decision in that case.

 

[2]               In these circumstances, these proceedings should be stayed until the Supreme Court delivers its judgment.

 

 

“Marc Noël”

J.A.

 

 

 

 

Certified true translation

Sarah Burns

 

Federal Court of Appeal

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A‑356‑11

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. SERGE TURBIDE

 

 

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

 

 

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:                                             NOËL J.A.

 

DATED:                                                                                 November 22, 2011

 

 

WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY:

 

Pierre Archambault

For the Appellant

 

Dany Leduc

For the respondent

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Dunton Rainville

Montréal, Quebec

 

For the Appellant

 

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the respondent

 

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.