Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

White v. Canada

Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date 2011-02-16
Neutral citation 2011 FCA 60
File numbers A-464-09

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110216

Docket: A-464-09

Citation: 2011 FCA 60

 

CORAM:       SEXTON J.A.

                        LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.                      

                        STRATAS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

DAVID WHITE

Appellant

and

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 16, 2011.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 16, 2011.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                        LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.

 

Federal Court of Appeal

 

Cour d'appel fédérale

Date: 20110216

Docket: A-464-09

Citation: 2011 FCA 60

 

CORAM:       SEXTON J.A.

                        LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.                      

                        STRATAS J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

DAVID WHITE

Appellant

And

 

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 16, 2011)

 

LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal from an order of Paris J. of the Tax Court of Canada (the judge) dismissing the appellant’s motion. On his motion, the appellant sought an order allowing his appeals and setting aside the income tax and goods and services tax assessments levied against him as the director of two corporations. The corporations failed to remit income tax source deductions and GST between 1992 and 2002. They went out of business in 2002.

[2]               The judge denied the motion for a number of reasons. After a comprehensive analysis, he determined that the issues raised by the appellant were best left to be determined at trial.

 

[3]               The appellant has not identified any error of law or principle on the part of the judge. Essentially, the appellant seeks a rehearing of his motion. That is not the function of an appellate court. Absent palpable and overriding error on the judge’s part, or an indication that he reached his decision on the basis of irrelevant factors or that he failed to have regard to relevant factors, this Court cannot intervene in the judge’s discretionary order. Neither has been demonstrated here.

 

[4]               Consequently, the appeal will be dismissed with costs to the respondent.

 

 

"Carolyn Layden-Stevenson"

J.A.

 

 

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-464-09

 

(APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARIS DATED NOVEMBER 9, 2009, IN TAX COURT FILE NOS. 2007-1561(IT)G & 2007-1665(GST)G)

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              DAVID WHITE

                                                                                                v.

                                                                                                HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        TORONTO, ONTARIO

 

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          FEBRUARY 16, 2011

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:                                                           (SEXTON, LAYDEN-STEVENSON & STRATAS JJ.A.)

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            LAYDEN-STEVENSON J.A.

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

David White

FOR THE APPELLANT

(Self-represented)

 

Shatru Ghan

Sandra K.S. Tsui

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

N/A

FOR THE APPELLANT

(Self-represented)

 

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.