Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Federal Court of Appeal

     CANADA

Cour d'appel fédérale


 

Date: 20110207

Docket: A-331-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 46

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.  

                        SHARLOW J.A.

                                               

                       

BETWEEN:

TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP AND

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY

Appellants

and

 

TSC STORES L.P.

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2011.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2011.

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                NOËL J.A.

 


Federal Court of Appeal

     CANADA

Cour d'appel fédérale


 

Date: 20110207

Docket: A-331-10

Citation: 2011 FCA 46

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        EVANS J.A.  

                        SHARLOW J.A.

                                   

                       

BETWEEN:

TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP AND

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY

Appellants

and

 

TSC STORES L.P.

Respondent

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on February 7, 2011)

 

NOËL J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal from an order of Mactavish J. of the Federal Court (the Motions Judge) dismissing a motion to stay two opposition proceedings before the Trade-marks Opposition Board (the Board) until the final disposition of a related action presently pending before the Federal Court.

 

[2]               The Motions Judge denied the stay for a number of reasons. After a lengthy analysis, she concluded that the appellants had failed to satisfy her that it would be in the interest of Justice to stay the proceedings before the Board (Section 50 of the Federal Courts Act R.S., 1985, c. F-7). She came to this conclusion on the basis of the test stated in White v. E.B.F. Manufacturing Ltd., [2001] F.C.J. No. 1073 at para.5. She added that she would have reached the same conclusion applying the three prong test set out in RJR–MacDonald v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311.

 

[3]               No error of principle is alleged and we are unable to detect a palpable and overriding error nor has it been established that the Motions Judge reached her decision on the basis of irrelevant factors or that she failed to have regard to relevant factors.

 

[4]               The appeal will be dismissed with costs.   

 

 

 

“Marc Noël”

J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                                      A-331-10

 

(APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE MACTAVISH OF THE FEDERAL COURT DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2010, DOCKET NO. T-1804-07 INTERLOCUTORY DOC. 92)

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      TRACTOR SUPPLY CO. OF TEXAS, LP AND

TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY v. TSC STORES

L.P.

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                  February 7, 2011

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF

THE COURT BY:                                          (NOËL, EVANS & SHARLOW JJ.A.)

 

DELIVERED FROM THE

BENCH BY:                                                   NOËL J.A.

                                                                                   

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Clifford I. Cole

Kevin Sartorio

 

FOR THE APPELLANTS

Shawn D. Jacka

Mark L. Robbins

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPELLANTS

 

BERESKIN & PARR LLP

Barristers and Solicitors

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.