Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20080212

Docket: A-258-07

Citation: 2008 FCA 57

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        SHARLOW J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

SURESPAN CONSTRUCTION LTD.

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 12, 2008.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 12, 2008.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                             PELLETIER J.A.

 


Date: 20080212

Docket: A-258-07

Citation: 2008 FCA 57

 

CORAM:       NOËL J.A.

                        SHARLOW J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

SURESPAN CONSTRUCTION LTD.

Applicant

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 12, 2008)

PELLETIER J.A.

[1]               We are of the view that there is no reason for us to intervene in the decision of the CITT. The applicant asked the CITT to commence an inquiry into the rejection of its bid for the construction of a bridge because the face page of the bid was not signed by an authorized official of the applicant as required by Tender documents. The CITT declined to embark upon an inquiry and dismissed the complaint summarily. It was argued before us that an inquiry would lead to consideration of whether the Government appropriately exercise the discretion which it had pursuant to the tender documents to waive minor irregularities in the tenders.

[2]               There is no basis upon which the CITT's decision could be set aside. The question is one which is squarely within its expertise. It concluded that the presence of a signature was mandatory. In our view the necessary implication which flows from that conclusion is that the CITT did not consider the absence of a signature to be a minor irregularity. The application will be dismissed with costs fixed at $2,000 inclusive of disbursements and taxes.

 

 

 

"J.D. Denis Pelletier"

J.A.

 

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-258-07

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              SURESPAN CONSTRUCTION LTD. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          February 12, 2008

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:       NOËL, SHARLOW, PELLETIER JJ.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            PELLETIER J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Gerry Stobo

Derek Leschinsky

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

 

Alexandre Kaufman

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Borden Ladner Gervais LL.P.

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.