BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON J.A.
Docket: A-132-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 28
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008)
[1] This is a borderline case. On the particulars facts of the case, we cannot conclude, on a standard of reasonableness, that the Umpire erred in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Board of Referees which found that the respondent had shown good cause for delaying her application for benefits.
[2] Accordingly, the Attorney General’s judicial review application will be dismissed with costs.
“M. Nadon”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-132-07
(AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE HON. MR. JUSTICE HADDAD, AS UMPIRE, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007. EMPLYOMENT INSURANCE. FILE: CUB 67658)
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 23, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY: (DÉCARY, NADON, TRUDEL J.J.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
FOR THE APPELLANT/ APPLICANT
|
|
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Deputy Attorney General of Canada Toronto, Ontario |
FOR THE APPELLANT/ APPLICANT
|
|
Barristers and Solicitors Toronto, Ontario |
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|