Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20070528

Docket: A-286-04

Citation: 2007 FCA 203

 

CORAM:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

GERALD D. WEBSTER

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

 

Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007.

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                             PELLETIER J.A.

 


Date: 20070528

Docket: A-286-04

Citation: 2007 FCA 203

 

CORAM:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                        NADON J.A.

                        PELLETIER J.A.

 

BETWEEN:

GERALD D. WEBSTER

Appellant

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

 

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 28, 2007)

PELLETIER J.A.

[1]               This is an appeal from the dismissal of a motion seeking to set aside the dismissal of the appellant's appeal for failure to appear.

 

[2]               In order to succeed in this appeal, the appellant must persuade us that the Tax Court judge did not properly exercise his discretion when he dismissed the appellant's motion.

 

 

[3]               Section 18.21(3) of the Tax Court of Canada Act provides that an order dismissing an appeal for failure to appear may be set aside if (a) it would have been unreasonable in all the circumstances for the appellant to have attended the hearing; and (b) the appellant applied to have the order of dismissal set aside as soon as circumstances permitted the application to be brought but, in any event, not later than one hundred and eighty days after the day on which the order was mailed to the appellant.

 

[4]               Consequently, the appellant needed to convince the Tax Court judge that he had a reasonable excuse for failing to appear at the hearing of this appeal. The Tax Court judge concluded that the appellant could have reasonably attended at the hearing of his appeal. On the basis of the record before the Tax Court judge, we are unable to say that the judge did not properly exercise his discretion.

 

[5]               The appellant attempted to persuade us that his appeal has merit. It may well but as this Court decided on Dayan v. Canada, 2004 FCA 75, [2004] F.C.J. No. 302, that fact does not dispense the appellant from complying with the requirements of section 18.21.

 

[6]               As a result the appeal will be dismissed with costs.

 

 

"J.D. Denis Pelletier"

J.A.

 


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

 

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

DOCKET:                                                                              A-286-04

 

APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF MR. JUSTICE O'CONNOR OF THE TAX COURT OF CANADA DATED DECEMBER 5, 2003

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                                              GERALD D. WEBSTER and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                        Fredericton, New Brunswick

 

DATE OF HEARING:                                                          May 28, 2007

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:       LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                                                                                                NADON J.A.

                                                                                                PELLETIER J.A.

 

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                            PELLETIER J.A.

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

John Henderson

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

Cecil Woon

Lindsay Holland

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

John Henderson Law Office

Saint John, New Brunswick

FOR THE APPELLANT

 

 

John H. Sims, Q.C.

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

 

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.