Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040317

Docket: A-160-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 115

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

NOËL J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                   VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                           and

                                                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                    Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004.

                   Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:                                                             NOËL J.A.


Date: 20040317

Docket: A-160-03

Citation: 2004 FCA 115

CORAM:        RICHARD C.J.

NOËL J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                   VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC

                                                                                                                                            Appellant

                                                                           and

                                                    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                             

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                     (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004)

NOËL J.A.

[1]         In our opinion, Tardif J.T.C.C. was entitled to affirm the assessments at issue, based on the evidence before him, even if the facts that he considered went beyond those on which the Minister relied to issue the assessments.


[2]                Contrary to Pedwell v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. 616, the judge of the Tax Court of Canada did not refer to a transaction other than the one cited by the Minister in issuing his assessments. He stated, in the course of his decision, that the ground retained by the Minister was not conclusive, in itself, but that he found that it became conclusive when considered with the other evidence filed, in large part, by the appellant herself.

[3]                This is not a situation where the appellant can legitimately claim that she did not have an opportunity to argue her point of view about the debate, as it was presented before the trial judge.

[4]                Moreover, the evidence enabled Tardif J.T.C.C. to make a finding of fact that the income at issue was the appellant's, and not that of her company.

[5]                The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

                                                                                                                                                           

                   "Marc Noël"                  

J.A.

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                                                                                                           

DOCKET:                                                                               A-160-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                      VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC

Appellant

                                                                           and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                                                         Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                                           March 17, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:             RICHARD C.J.

NOËL J.A.

PELLETIER J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:                             NOËL J.A.

APPEARANCES:

André A. Lévesque

FOR THE APPELLANT

Valérie Tardif

Nathalie Labbé

FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:                                                                                                          

André A. Lévesque

Bonaventure, Quebec

FOR THE APPELLANT

MORRIS ROSENBERG

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.