Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020610

Docket: A-364-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 244

CORAM:      LINDEN J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                        

EXPERTECH NETWORK INSTALLATION INC.

                                                                 Appellant

                                      - and -                 

                                                                    

                                    

COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY & PAPERWORKERS UNION

OF CANADA AND LUCIEN MORASSUTTI

Respondents

                                                                                   

                                    

                                      Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on Monday, June 10, 2002.

             Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on Monday, June 10, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                               LINDEN J.A.


Date: 20020610

Docket: A-364-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 244

CORAM:      LINDEN J.A.

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

EXPERTECH NETWORK INSTALLATION INC.

                                                                 Appellant

                                      - and -                 

                                                                    

                                    

COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY & PAPERWORKERS UNION

OF CANADA AND LUCIEN MORASSUTTI

Respondents

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto,

Ontario, on Monday, June 10, 2002)

LINDEN J.A.

[1]                 We have not been persuaded, despite the able argument of Counsel, that the learned Prothonotary erred in dismissing the Motion.

"A. M. Linden"

line

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.                          


                                                                                          FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                             Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                                               A-364-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:             EXPERTECH NETWORK INSTALLATION INC.

                                                                 Appellant

                                                                                   

- and -                

COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY &

PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA AND

LUCIEN MORASSUTTI

Respondents

DATE OF HEARING:         MONDAY, JUNE 10, 2002

PLACE OF HEARING:        TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY:         LINDEN J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH AT TORONTO, ONTARIO ON MONDAY, JUNE 10,

2002.

DATED:                    MONDAY, JUNE 10, 2002

APPEARANCES BY:        Ms. Susan L. Crawford

Mr. Justin Diggle

For the Appellant

No appearance

For the Respondents

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:CRAWFORD CHONDON & ANDREE LLP

Barristers & Solicitors

197 County Court Blvd.

Suite 304

Brampton, Ontario

L6W 4P6

For the Appellant

Mr. Lucien Morassutti

4425 Concession 3

R.R. #1


Stoney Point, Ontario

N0R 1N0

For the Respondents


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 20020610

Docket: A-364-01

BETWEEN:

  

EXPERTECH NETWORK INSTALLATION

INC.

                                                                Appellant

                                                                                   

                                         

                                 - and -                

                                    

                                                              

COMMUNICATIONS, ENERGY &

PAPERWORKERS UNION OF CANADA AND

LUCIEN MORASSUTTI

Respondents

                                                                         

                                                                           

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT

                                                                          

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.