Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020917

Docket: A-587-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 338

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NADON J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                Appellant (Defendant)

                                                                                 and

                                                                 PETER DUPLESSIS

                                                                                                                                 Respondent (Plaintiff)

                                          Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 17, 2002.

                  Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 17, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                               ROTHSTEIN J.A.


Date: 20020917

Docket: A-587-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 338

CORAM:        ROTHSTEIN J.A.

NADON J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                        HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                                                                                                                                Appellant (Defendant)

                                                                                 and

                                                                 PETER DUPLESSIS

                                                                                                                                 Respondent (Plaintiff)

                                                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                    (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on September 17, 2002)

ROTHSTEIN J.A.

[1]                 The appellant has not satisfied us that Lemieux J. was clearly wrong in dismissing the motion to strike the Statement of Claim. Therefore, the appeal will be dismissed. The respondent will be entitled to costs of $5,000 inclusive of disbursements in any event of the cause.

                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                      "Marshall Rothstein"           

                                                                                                                                                                 J.A.                    


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

  

DOCKET:                                             A-587-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. PETER DUPLESSIS

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario

  

DATE OF HEARING:                       September 17, 2002

  

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (Rothstein, Nadon, Sharlow, JJA.)

  

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: (Rothstein, J.A.)

  

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Michael Ciavaglia                                                                  FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. Michael Roach

Ms. Barbara A. McIsaac, Q.C.                                                    FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Morris Rosenberg                                                                  FOR THE APPELLANT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

McCarthy Tétrault                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

Ottawa, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.