Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980512


Docket: A-913-96

CORAM:          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

     THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DESJARDINS

     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY

     IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to Section 77

     of the Official Languages Act. R.S.C. 1985, c.31 (4th Supp.)

BETWEEN:

     ROBERT LAVIGNE

     Applicant-Appellant


AND:

     HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

     (FORMERLY HEALTH AND WELFARE CANADA)

     -and-

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondents

     AND:

     THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

     OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES

     Intervenor

Heard at Montreal, Quebec Monday, May 11, 1998

Judgment delivered at Montreal, Quebec Monday, May 11, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

                                         Date: 19980512

                                         Docket: A-913-96

CORAM:              DENAULT J.A.

                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                 DÉCARY J.A.

     IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to Section 77

     of the Official Languages Act. R.S.C. 1985, c.31 (4th Supp.)

BETWEEN:     

     ROBERT LAVIGNE

     Applicant-Appellant


AND:

     HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

     (FORMERLY HEALTH AND WELFARE CANADA)

     -and-

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondents

     AND:

     THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

     OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES

     Intervenor

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

     (Rendered from the Bench at Montreal on

     Monday, May 11, 1998)

DENAULT J.A.

[1]      We have not been persuaded that this appeal should succeed.

[2]      While we substantially agree with the statements of Pinard J. about the wide discretion of the Trial Division, pursuant to subsection 77(4) of the Official Languages Act, to award the appropriate remedies, including damages, we are of the view that on the basis of the evidence he had before him, he properly refused to re-instate the Appellant within the Federal Public Service. There is no ground for intervention in his conclusions that the Appellant, having established no causal link between the non-compliance by Human Resources Development with Part V of Act and the fact that he was not re-hired, he was not entitled to loss of salary and benefits, and that the circumstances of the case did not justify that exemplary damages be granted. Nothing in the arguments raised by the Appellant warrants the intervention of this Court.

[3]      The appeal will be dismissed, with costs to the Respondents only.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

MONTREAL, QUEBEC

May 12, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL


Date: 19980512


Docket: A-913-96

IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to

Section 77 of the Official Languages Act. R.S.C. 1985,

c.31 (4th Supp.)

BETWEEN:

     ROBERT LAVIGNE

     Applicant-Appellant


AND:

     HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

     (FORMERLY HEALTH AND WELFARE CANADA)

     -and-

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondents

     AND:

     THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

     OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES

     Intervenor

    

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

    

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     APPEAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NUMBER:                  A-913-96

                 IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to Section 77

                 of the Official Languages Act. R.S.C. 1985, c.31 (4th Supp.)

BETWEEN:                      ROBERT LAVIGNE

     Applicant-Appellant

                             AND:

                             HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

                             (FORMERLY HEALTH AND WELFARE

                             CANADA)

                             -and-

                             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

     Respondents

                             AND:

                             THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER

                             OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES

     Intervenor

PLACE OF HEARING:              Montreal (Quebec)

DATE OF HEARING:                  May 11, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (DENAULT, DESJARDINS & DÉCARY,

J. J.A.)

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY:          DENAULT J.A.

     - 2 -

DATED:                          May 12, 1998

APPEARANCES:

     Mr. Robert Lavigne                  the Applicant-Appellant

     Me Robert Piché

     Me Michel Pépin                  for the Respondents

     Me Elizabeth Grace                  for the Intervenor

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     George Tompson                  for the Respondents

     The Deputy Attorney General

     of Canada

     Ottawa, Ontario

     Office of the Commissioner              the Intervenor

     of Official Languages

     Ottawa, Ontario


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.