Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20020521

Docket: A-643-00

A-222-01

A-302-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 209

CORAM:        STONE J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

ISAAC J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                                         

                       REDDY RAJAGOPAL CHAVALI, REDDY KRISHNAVENI CHAVALI,

and REDDY VENKATASUBBARAMI CHAVALI

Appellants

(Plaintiffs)

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

and THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL,

AND THE FOLLOWING:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA;

LAWYERS'PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; CHARLES HARNICK;

W.D. CHILCOTT J; J.B. CHADWICK J; DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J;

PETER A. CUMMING J; DOUGLAS COO J; ARCHIBALD J;

THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD; LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES; NELLIGAN-POWER;

MARK GEDDES; DAVID CHICK; ARTHUR AULT;

GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSON;

ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION; GEORGE GATY;

CHATEAU ROYALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC;

LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA; PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC;

ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA; THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK;

ALLAN O'BRIEN; JAMES MORTON; JERRY LEVITAN; KANNY NG;


MAJESTIC KEY MANAGEMENT LTD; SAMUEL TALBERT;

COLETTE TALBERT; PIAZZA, BROOKS & SIDDONS;

THE CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA;

SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN; ANDRE BLUTEAU; MONICA CHARLES;

FELIX CHARLES; and KAY CHARLES

Respondents

(Defendants)

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 21, 2002.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario on May 21, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                   ISAAC J.A.


Date: 20020521

Docket: A-643-00

A-222-01

A-302-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 209

CORAM:        STONE J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

ISAAC J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                                                         

                       REDDY RAJAGOPAL CHAVALI, REDDY KRISHNAVENI CHAVALI,

and REDDY VENKATASUBBARAMI CHAVALI

Appellants

(Plaintiffs)

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

and THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL,

AND THE FOLLOWING:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA;

LAWYERS'PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; CHARLES HARNICK;

W.D. CHILCOTT J; J.B. CHADWICK J; DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J;

PETER A. CUMMING J; DOUGLAS COO J; ARCHIBALD J;

THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD; LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES; NELLIGAN-POWER;

MARK GEDDES; DAVID CHICK; ARTHUR AULT;

GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSON;

ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION; GEORGE GATY;

CHATEAU ROYALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC;

LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA; PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC;

ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA; THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK;

ALLAN O'BRIEN; JAMES MORTON; JERRY LEVITAN; KANNY NG;


MAJESTIC KEY MANAGEMENT LTD; SAMUEL TALBERT;

COLETTE TALBERT; PIAZZA, BROOKS & SIDDONS;

THE CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA;

SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN; ANDRE BLUTEAU; MONICA CHARLES;

FELIX CHARLES; and KAY CHARLES

Respondents

(Defendants)

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario

on May 21, 2002.)

ISAAC J.A.:

[1]                 The appellants appeal against ten orders of Denault J, dated 5 October, 2000, and two orders of Blanchard J dated 30 March, 2001, and 9 May, 2001, respectively.

[2]                 The orders of Denault J were made first on motions for orders pursuant to Rule 208, that this Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the causes of action raised in the statements of claim, and second, for orders pursuant to Rule 221 striking out the statements of claim and dismissing the actions as against them on the ground that they disclosed no reasonable causes of action.

[3]                 For his part, Blanchard J heard a motion by the Canadian Judicial Council for an order, pursuant to Rule 221, striking out the statement of claim and dismissing the action against it. Of his own motion, the learned motions Judge raised the issue of jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the claim which he decided adversely to the appellants.


[4]                 On 9 May, 2001, Blanchard J dismissed the appellants' motion dated 27 February, 2001, but he granted them an extension of time to respond to a motion brought by the Corporation of the City of Ottawa. He also dismissed the appellants' request that their motion dated 9 November, 2000 be heard before that of the Corporation of the City of Ottawa or alternatively, that both motions be deferred until the final appeal had been heard.

[5]                 After hearing submissions from each of the appellants, at great length, we are not persuaded that either of the learned Judges made any error in law. Furthermore, we are satisfied that in each case they both took into account all relevant considerations in exercising their discretion pursuant to Rule 221 to strike out the statements of claim.

[6]                 Accordingly, the appeals will be dismissed with costs to the respondents who appeared at the hearing of these appeals.

"JULIUS A. ISAAC"

line

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.                       


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-643-00

A-222-01

A-302-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           REDDY RAJAGOPAL CHAVALI, REDDY KRISHNAVENI CHAVALI, and REDDY VENKATASUBBARAMI CHAVALI

Appellants

(Plaintiffs)

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA; HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO and THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL,

AND THE FOLLOWING:


THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA; LAWYERS' PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; CHARLES HARNICK; W.D. CHILCOTT J; J.B. CHADWICK J; DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J; PETER A. CUMMING J; DOUGLAS COO J; ARCHIBALD J; THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD; LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES; NELLIGAN-POWER; MARK GEDDES; DAVID CHICK; ARTHUR AULT; GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSON; ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION; GEORGE GATY; CHATEAU ROYALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC; LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA; PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC; ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA; THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK; ALLAN O'BRIEN; JAMES MORTON; JERRY LEVITAN; KANNY NG; MAJESTIC KEY MANAGEMENT LTD; SAMUEL TALBERT; COLETTE TALBERT; PIAZZA, BROOKS & SIDDONS; THE CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA; SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN; ANDRE BLUTEAU; MONICA CHARLES; FELIX CHARLES; and KAY CHARLES

                                                                                                                                                    Respondents

(Defendants)

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       May 21, 2002

REASONS FOR REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT : ISAAC J.A.

DATED:                                                May 21, 2002

APPEARANCES:

Reddy Rajagopal Chavali                                                               FOR THE APPELLANTS

Reddy Krishnaveni Chavali

Reddy Venkatasubbarami Chavali

( On their own behalf )                                                                 

Ms. Susanne Perreira

Mr. Don Rennie                                                                              FOR THE RESPONDENTS

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL.


Ms. Ainslie Benedict                                                                       FOR THE RESPONDENTS LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, LAWYERS' PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD ASSOCIATES, NELLIGAN POWER, MARK GEDDES, DAVID CHICK, ARTHUR AULT, GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON, ALLAN O'BRIEN, JAMES MORTON, JERRY LEVITAN, PIAZZA BROOKS & SIDDONS, SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN, ANDRE BLUTEAU, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA.

Mr. Thomas C. Barber                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENTS W.D. CHILCOOT J., B. CHADWICK J., DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J., PETER A. CUMMING J., DOUGLAS COO J. AND ARCHIBALD J.

Mr. Barry Garland                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENTS ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, GEORGE GATY, CHATEAU ROYAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC.

Mr. Erice M. Appotive                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT PEAT MARVICK THORNE INC.

Mr. Larry Reimer                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENTS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AND CHARLES HARNICK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO.

Mr. Roderick Brooks                                                                     FOR THE RESPONDENTS SAMUEL TALBERT AND COLETTE TALBERT

Ms. Ivana Baldelli                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA.

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Reddy Rajagopal Chavali                                                               FOR THE APPELLANTS

Reddy Krishnaveni Chavali

Reddy Venkatasubbarami Chavali

( On their own behalf)                          


Morris Rosenberg, Deputy

Attorney General of Canada                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENTS

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL.

Nelligan Power LLP

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                             FOR THE RESPONDENTS LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, LAWYERS' PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD ASSOCIATES, NELLIGAN POWER, MARK GEDDES, DAVID CHICK, ARTHUR AULT, GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON, ALLAN O'BRIEN, JAMES MORTON, JERRY LEVITAN, PIAZZA BROOKS & SIDDONS, SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN, ANDRE BLUTEAU, ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA

Burke-Robertson

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS W.D. CHILCOOT J., B. CHADWICK J., DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J., PETER A. CUMMING J., DOUGLAS COO J. AND ARCHIBALD J.

Goldberg, Kronick & Strout

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, GEORGE GATY, CHATEAU ROYAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC.


Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA

Hamilton Appotive Callan

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT PEAT MARVICK THORNE INC.

Mr. Colin C. Taylor

Toronto Dominion Bank Legal Dept.

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT TORONTO DOMINION BANK

Piazza, Brooks & Siddons

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS SAMUEL TALBERT AND COLETTE TALBERT

Ms. Ivana Baldelli

City of Ottawa Legal Dept.

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.