Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20011016

                                                                                                                                         Docket: A-196-01

Ottawa, Ontario, October 16, 2001

CORAM:        THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DESJARDINS

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NOËL

BETWEEN:

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

- and -

BERTHA LÉVESQUE

Respondent

JUDGMENT

The application for judicial review is allowed, the umpire's decision is set aside and the matter is sent back to the chief umpire or to an umpire appointed by him for a decision on the understanding that the claimant does not fulfill the conditions prescribed in subsection 7(2) of the Act.

Without costs.

                         Alice Desjardins

                                                                       J.A.

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.


Date: 20011016

                                              Docket: A-196-01

CORAM:        DESJARDINS

DÉCARY

NOËL, JJ.A.

BETWEEN:

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

BERTHA LÉVESQUE

Respondent

Hearing held in Ottawa, Ontario, Tuesday, October 16, 2001

Judgment pronounced at the hearing in Ottawa, Ontario, Tuesday, October 16, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: DESJARDINS J.A.


Date: 20011016

                                              Docket: A-196-01

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 304

CORAM:        DESJARDINS

DÉCARY

NOËL, JJ.A.

BETWEEN:

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Applicant

and

BERTHA LÉVESQUE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Pronounced at the hearing Tuesday, October 16, 2001)

DESJARDINS J.A.

[1]         We are regretfully of the opinion that this application for judicial review should be allowed.


[2]         The claimant accumulated 594 hours of work instead of the 595 hours required by subsection 7(2) of the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23. She was short one hour of work in order to fulfill the conditions required by that section if she was to be eligible for unemployment benefits. This requirement of the Act does not allow any discrepancy and provides no discretion. Neither the board of referees nor the umpire could remove the defect from the claim.

[3]         The application for judicial review will be allowed, the umpire's decision set aside and the matter sent back to the chief umpire or to an umpire appointed by him for a decision on the understanding that the claimant does not fulfill the conditions prescribed in subsection 7(2) of the Act.

[4]         The whole without costs.

                       "Alice Desjardins"

                                                                       J.A.

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

FILE NO:                                  A-196-01

STYLE:                                     

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

and

BERTHA LÉVESQUE

PLACE OF HEARING:                      OTTAWA, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                         OCTOBER 16, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Desjardins, Décary & Noël, JJ.A.

DATED:                                                 OCTOBER 16, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Marie Crowley                                                     FOR THE APPLICANT

Bertha Lévesque                                                                FOR HERSELF

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                FOR THE APPLICANT

Bertha Lévesque

Casselman, Ontario                                                           FOR HERSELF

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.