Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20050126

Docket: A-332-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 37

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NADON J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                                 GLEN GREEN

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                 Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2005.

           Judgment delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2005.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                                  DÉCARY J.A.


Date: 20050126

Docket: A-332-04

Citation: 2005 FCA 37

CORAM:        DÉCARY J.A.

NADON J.A.

SEXTON J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                             ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                           and

                                                                 GLEN GREEN

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

            (Delivered from the Bench at Vancouver, British Columbia on January 26, 2005)

DÉCARY J.A.

[1]                This is yet another case dealing with the failure to properly record on tape the hearing before a Board of Referees. Relying on a decision rendered a few months earlier by an umpire in Valladolid (CUB 54497 A), the Umpire refused to send the matter back to the Board for a new hearing and simply set aside the Board's decision, "in the hope that in the future, Board of Referees will be more efficient and careful so as not to destroy the evidence thus violating a basic principle of natural justice".


[2]                Valladolid, however, has since been reversed by this Court (Canada (Attorney General) v. Valadolid, 2004 FCA 142). Evans J.A. held that the Umpire had erred in law "by failing to consider whether, despite the absence of the tape, the written record before him was sufficient to enable him to fairly determine the appeal.".

[3]                The application will be allowed, the decision of the Umpire will be set aside and the matter will be remitted to the Chief Umpire or his delegate to determine whether, in the absence of the tape recording, the record of what is available is sufficient to enable an umpire to fairly decide the appeal.

                                                                                                                        (Sgd.) "Robert Décary"

                                                                                                                                                      J.A.


                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                            NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

                                                                             

DOCKET:                                          A-332-04

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          Her Majesty the Queen v. Glen Green                                                                                              

                                                                             

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Vancouver, British Columbia

DATE OF HEARING:                      January 26, 2004

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT : (Décary, Nadon & Sexton JJ.A.)   

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Décary, J.A.

DATED: January 26, 2004                

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Mary-Ann Barker                                                               FOR THE APPLICANT

                                                                                                FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. John H. Sims, Q.C.                                                            FOR THE APPLICANT

Deputy Attorney General for Canada                                        

FOR THE RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.