Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     A-203-96

CORAM:      STRAYER J.A.

     ROBERTSON J.A.

     GRAY D.J.

B E T W E E N:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Applicant

     " and "

     770373 ONTARIO LIMITED

     Respondent

HEARD at Toronto, Ontario on Thursday, January 23, 1997

JUDGMENT delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Thursday, January 23, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      STRAYER J.A.

     A-203-96

CORAM:      STRAYER J.A.

     ROBERTSON J.A.

     GRAY D.J.

B E T W E E N:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Applicant

     " and "

     770373 ONTARIO LIMITED

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

     (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto,

     Ontario on Thursday, January 23, 1997)

STRAYER J.A.

     The Court has found this application for judicial review to be difficult because no findings of fact and no reasons were given by the learned Tax Court Judge in support of his decision to set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent under section 280 of the Excise Tax Act.

     The only basis argued before us for supporting that decision has been the defence of due diligence, a matter adverted to briefly by the Minister's counsel in the Tax Court. Even if in law there is a defence of due diligence to payment of the penalty under section 280, a matter which we find it inappropriate to decide in these circumstances, we have been referred to no evidence before the trial judge, either in the transcript of the trial proceedings or in documents, that would have supported such a defence. We must therefore set aside the decision on the basis that it was made without regard to the evidence, even assuming that there was no error of law in applying a defence of due diligence.

     The application will therefore be allowed, the decision of the Tax Court be set aside and the matter referred back to the Tax Court for determination in accordance with these reasons. Reasonable and proper costs will be awarded to the respondent in accordance with section 18.3008 of the Tax Court of Canada Act.

    

                                 J.A.

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     Court No. A-203-96

B E T W E E N:

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Applicant

     -- and --

     770373 ONTARIO LIMITED

     Respondent

     -- REASONS FOR JUDGMENT --

     (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto

     Ontario on Thursday, January 23, 1997)



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO.:

A-203-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:

Attorney General of Canada v. 770373 Ontario Limited

PLACE OF HEARING:

Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:

Thursday, January 23, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT:

Strayer J. A.

Robertson J.A.

Gray D.J.

RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY:

Strayer J. A.

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Harry Ehrlichman

Ms. Marilyn Vardy

for the Applicant

Mr. David M. Sherman

for the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. George Thomson

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario

for the Applicant

Mr. David Sherman

Thornhill, Ontario

for the Respondent

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.