Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 19980318

     Docket: A-3-97

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 18th DAY OF MARCH 1998

CORAM:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

     THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DESJARDINS

     THE HONOURABLE DEPUTY JUSTICE CHEVALIER

BETWEEN:

     DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,

     Appellant,

     AND:

     BENNETT FLEET INC.,

     Respondent.

     J U D G M E N T

         The appeal is dismissed.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.


     Docket: A-3-97

CORAM:              DENAULT J.A.

                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                 CHEVALIER D.J.

BETWEEN:

     DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,

     Appellant,

     AND

     BENNETT FLEET INC.,

     Respondent.

     Hearing held at Montréal on Wednesday, March 18, 1998

     Judgment delivered at Montréal on Wednesday, March 18, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:      DENAULT J.A.

     Date: 19980318

     Docket: A-3-97

CORAM:              DENAULT J.A.

                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                 CHEVALIER D.J.

BETWEEN:

     DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,

     Appellant,

     AND:

     BENNETT FLEET INC.,

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

     (Delivered from the bench at Montréal

     on Wednesday, March 18, 1998)

DENAULT J.A.

[1]      We are all of the opinion that the Tribunal did not commit any error which would justify the intervention of this Court.

[2]      In the instant case, it was not unreasonable for the Tribunal to conclude that the concept of impregnation, having regard to the evidence and when analysed in light of Note I) A) of the Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, did not make the goods in issue impregnated goods within the meaning of Note 2 of Chapter 48 of Schedule I to the Customs Tariff.

[3]      Accordingly, it was not unreasonable to assign the goods in issue (shoeboard) to position 48.05, and more specifically to tariff number 48.05.80.10, rather than position 48.11.

[4]      The appeal will be dismissed.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

March 18, 1998

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     Date: 19980318

     Docket: A-3-97

Between:

     DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,

     Appellant,

     AND:

     BENNETT FLEET INC.,

     Respondent.

    

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

    



     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL        
     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD        
COURT FILE NO:      A-3-97        
STYLE OF CAUSE:      DEPUTY MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE,        
     Appellant,        
         AND        
         BENNETT FLEET INC.,        
     Respondent.        
PLACE OF HEARING:      Montréal, Quebec        
DATE OF HEARING:      March 18, 1998        
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (DENAULT AND DESJARDINS JJ.A., CHEVALIER D.J.)        
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Denault        
     Dated:          March 18, 1998        
APPEARANCES:        
     Stéphane Lilkoff          for the appellant        
     Peter Kirby          for the respondent        

     - 2 -      A-3-97        
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:        
     George Thomson          for the appellant        
     Deputy Attorney General of Canada        
     Ottawa, Ontario        
     MARTINEAU WALKER          for the respondent        
     Montréal, Quebec        
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.