Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20021106

                                                                                                                                        Docket: A-497-02

                                                                                                                Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 434

BETWEEN:

                                                            DOROTHY B. MURRAY

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                  THE CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                                            REASONS FOR ORDER

STRAYER J.A.

[1]                 The matter properly before me at this time is the appellant's motion filed on October 9, 2002, asking the Court to determine the contents of the appeal book. The respondent never properly responded to the appellant's request for "input" into the content of the appeal book. Its letter of September 30, 2002 stating that it would not address this issue until a motion to add a party was disposed of was an irrelevant excuse. Further, it has failed to respond to the appellant's motion that is before me within the time permitted nor has it applied for an extension of time to do so. It now seeks an extension of time by letter without a motion and affidavit nor with the consent of the appellant.


[2]                 I must therefore proceed to dispose of the appellant's motion As she has failed to provide the Court with a complete list of documents that should be included in the appeal book, I will proceed on the basis that the appeal book should normally contain the material that was before the trial judge whose decision is under appeal. The purpose of an appeal is to determine if the judge made any reviewable mistake on the basis of the material before him or if he wrongly failed to admit any other material. In the absence of any other specific submissions by the appellant I believe the relevant material for inclusion in the appeal book would therefore be, as suggested by the respondent in its letter to the Court of November 1, 2002, the following material in Court file T-1733-00.

(1)        The applicant's record.

(2)        The record of the Attorney General of Canada

(3)        The transcript of the proceeding.

Item (2) will include the applicant's letter to Mr. Chamberlain dated April 26, 2000 which she has specifically requested be included in the appeal book. The appeal book should also contain the documents specifically required by Rule 344.

[3]                 I will therefore direct that these form the contents of the appeal book.

  

                                                                                                                                           (s) "B.L.Strayer"          

J.A.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

    

DOCKET:                                             A-497-02

  

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Dorothy B. Murray and The Canadian Human Rights Commission

  

MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE STRAYER

  

DATED:                                                November 6, 2002

   

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Dorothy B. Murray                                                                 FOR THE APPELLANT

Ms. Caroline Engmann                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT

  

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ms. Dorothy B. Murray, self-represented

Toronto, Ontario                                                                            FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                             FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.