CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PRATTE J.A.
LINDEN J.A.
A-293-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
A-294-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,
on Tuesday, April 8, 1997)
PRATTE J.A.
The applicant attacks orders of the Tax Court of Canada refusing him leave to amend two appeals pursuant to paragraph 165(7)(b) of the Income Tax Act.1
It is common ground that the appeals which the applicant wished to amend had already been disposed of by two consent judgments of the Tax Court. It follows that those appeals could not be amended since an appeal which has been disposed of no longer exists.
In effect, the applicant, in making these motions before the Tax Court, did not intend to re-open the two appeals. His purpose was to challenge the correctness of the reassessments made by the Minister following the two consent judgments. However, the only proper way to do that was to object to and appeal from those reassessments.
The Tax Court made no error in deciding as it did. The applications will, therefore, be dismissed.
"Louis Pratte"
J.A.
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PRATTE J.A.
LINDEN J.A.
A-293-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
A-294-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
Heard at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on Tuesday, April 8, 1997.
Judgment rendered from the Bench on Tuesday, April 8, 1997.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PRATTE J.A.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
A-293-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
A-294-96
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM LEHNER
Applicant
- and -
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT
__________________
1 This paragraph reads as follows:
165. (7) Where a taxpayer has served in accordance with this section a notice of objection to an assessment and thereafter the Minister reassesses the tax, interest, penalties or other amount in respect of which the notice of objection was served or makes an additional assessment in respect thereof and sends to the taxpayer a notice of the reassessment or of the additional assessment, as the case may be, the taxpayer may, without serving a notice of objection to the reassessment or additional assessment, ... ( b) amend any appeal to the Tax Court of Canada that has been instituted with respect to the assessment by joining thereto an appeal in respect of the reassessment or the additional assessment in such manner and on such terms, if any, as the Tax Court of Canada directs.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE NOS: A-293-96 A-294-96
STYLE OF CAUSE: William Lehner v.
Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF HEARING: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
DATE OF HEARING: April 8, 1997
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: (The Chief Justice, Pratte and Linden JJ.A.)
RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Pratte J. A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Henry L. Siwak for the Applicant
Ms. Donna C. Gilbertson for the Respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
West-Siwak
Prince Albert, Saskatchewan for the Applicant
Mr. George Thomson
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario for the Respondent