Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




Date: 20000628


Docket: A-552-99

CORAM:      LÉTOURNEAU, J.A.

         EVANS, J.A.

         SHARLOW, J.A.


BETWEEN:


APOTEX INC

     Appellant

     (Respondent)

    

- and -




JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. and

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA naamloze vennootscap

Respondents

(Applicants)


- and -




THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE

Respondent

(Respondent)




Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on Wednesday, June 28, 2000


Order delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,

on Wednesday, June 28, 2000



REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT:      SHARLOW J.A.




Date: 20000628


Docket: A-552-99

CORAM:      LÉTOURNEAU, J.A.

         EVANS, J.A.

         SHARLOW, J.A.


BETWEEN:


APOTEX INC

     Appellant

     (Respondent)

    

- and -




JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. and

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA naamloze vennootscap

Respondents

(Applicants)


- and -




THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE

Respondent

(Respondent)



REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

on Wednesday, June 28, 2000)

SHARLOW J.A.

         _.      On August 22, 1994, an application was commenced for an order prohibiting the Minister of National Health and Welfare from issuing a Notice of Compliance to the Appellant in respect of the drug cisapride. That application was a response to a Notice of Allegation served by the Appellant on July 11, 1994. The application was heard on December 15 to 18, 1998 and January 14 and 15, 1999.
         _.      Paragraph 7(1)(e) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations precludes the Minister of Health from issuing a Notice of Compliance for a specified period once the Minister receives proof that an application for a prohibition order has been commenced. In this case, the statutory injunction would have expired on January 12, 1999 but for an order granted by the Motions Judge on January 8, 1999 with the consent of the parties. That order extended the injunction to the date of the Motions Judge"s disposition of the application.
         _.      Following the completion of the hearing on January 15, 1999, the Motions Judge reserved his decision. By August 3, 1999, the decision was still under reserve and the Appellant applied for a variation that would have put an end to the statutory injunction unless the Respondents applied, within 14 days, for an order continuing the extension on the basis of the Appellant"s failure to reasonably cooperate in expediting the application. On August 25, 1999, the Motions Judge dismissed the motion for a variation. That order is the subject of this appeal which was commenced by the Appellant on September 7, 1999. The Motions Judge granted the prohibition order on February 9, 2000, thus disposing of the application on its merits.
         _.      In view of the informed, unlimited and unconditional consent of the Appellant to the extension of the injunction until disposition of the application, we are satisfied that the Motions Judge properly exercised his discretion when, on the motion of the Appellant seven months after the consent order, he refused to shorten the injunction period as extended by the consent order.
         _.      The appeal will be dismissed with costs.

     "Karen R. Sharlow"

     J.A.


         _.                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

                            

DOCKET:                      A-552-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:                  APOTEX INC

     Appellant

     (Respondent)

                         - and -

                         JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA naamloze vennootscap

Respondents

(Applicants)

                         - and -

                         THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE

Respondent

(Respondent)

DATE OF HEARING:              WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2000

                

PLACE OF HEARING:              TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

OF THE COURT BY:              SHARLOW J.A.

Delivered at Toronto, Ontario on Wednesday, June 28, 2000

APPEARANCES:                  Mr. H. B. Radomski

                             For the Appellant (Respondent)

                                    

                         Mr. Anthony G. Greber

                        

                 For the Respondents (Applicants)
                         No One Appeared
                             For the Respondent (Respondent)
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          Goodman Phillips & Vineberg

                         Barristers & Solicitors

                         2400- 250 Yonge Street

                         Toronto, Ontario

                         M5B 2M6

                             For the Appellant (Respondent)

Solicitors of Record ...cont"d

                         Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
                         Barristers & Solicitors
                         2600- 160 Elgin Street
                         P.O. Box 466, Station "D"
                         Ottawa, Ontario
                         K1P 1C3
                             For the Respondents (Applicants)
                         Morris Rosenberg
                         Deputy Attorney General of Canada
                             For the Respondent (Respondent)

                         FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL


Date: 20000628


Docket: A-552-99

                        

                         BETWEEN:

                         APOTEX INC

     Appellant

     (Respondent)

                         - and -



                         JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA naamloze vennootscap

Respondents

(Applicants)

                         - and -



                         THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE

Respondent

(Respondent



                        

                        

                         REASONS FOR ORDER
                         OF THE COURT

                        

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.