Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                                            Date: 20010621

                                                                                                                                         Docket: A-231-00

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2001

CORAM:        DÉCARY

LÉTOURNEAU

NOËL JJ.A.

Between:

LOUISE MONGRAIN

Applicant

AND

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

JUDGMENT

The Appeal is dismissed, without costs.

                        "Robert Décary"

                                                                       J.A.

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.


Date: 20010621

                                              Docket: A-231-00

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 209

CORAM:        DÉCARY

LÉTOURNEAU

NOËL JJ.A.

Between:

LOUISE MONGRAIN

Applicant

AND

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

Hearing held in Montréal, Quebec, Wednesday, June 20, 2001

Judgment rendered in Montréal, Quebec, Thursday, June 21, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:             DÉCARY J.A.

CONCURRING:             LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

                                                           NOËL J.A.


Date: 20010621

                                              Docket: A-231-00

Neutral Citation: 2001 FCA 209

CORAM:        DÉCARY

LÉTOURNEAU

NOËL JJ.A.

Between:

LOUISE MONGRAIN

Applicant

AND

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

DÉCARY J.A.

[1]         For each of the 1996 and 1997 taxation years, the Minister of National Revenue included in the appellant's income an amount of $3,600 she allegedly received as support for her children.


[2]         The appellant's appeal from these assessments was dismissed by Her Honour Judge Lamarre Proulx of the Tax Court of Canada. This decision is reported at [2000] T.C.J. 153 (Q.L.).

[3]         The documentary and testimonial evidence, and the applicable statutory provisions, sections 56(1)(b) and 56.1(4) of the Income Tax Act, immunize that decision from any attack.

[4]         The appellant sought to contradict, through her testimony, the terms of an agreement that she and her former husband had signed on August 11, 1995. The judge did not credit this testimony and preferred to rely on the version of the facts provided by the former husband, whose credibility she was in a position to assess. Moreover, this version was supported by other evidence.

[5]         The appeal should therefore be dismissed, but without costs in the circumstances.

                        "Robert Décary"

                                                                       J.A.

"I agree

    Gilles Létourneau J.A."

"I agree

    Marc Noël J.A."

Certified true translation

Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L., Trad. a.


             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

Date: 20010621

                                                           Docket: A-231-00

Between:

LOUISE MONGRAIN

Applicant

AND

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

APPEAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

FILE NO:                                  A-231-00

CORAM:        DÉCARY

LÉTOURNEAU

NOËL JJ.A.

STYLE:                                      LOUISE MONGRAIN

Applicant

AND

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:         Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:            June 20, 2001

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: DÉCARY J.A.

CONCURRING:                     LÉTOURNEAU J.A.

NOËL J.A.

DATED:                                   June 21, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Louise Mongrain                                                                             FOR THE APPLICANT

Nathalie Lessard                                                                             FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montréal, Quebec                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.