Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                         Date: 19980514

                                         Docket: A-855-97

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THE 14th DAY OF MAY 1998

CORAM:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

     THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DESJARDINS

     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY

BETWEEN:

     RONALD FORTIN

     Applicant-claimant


AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     -and-

     CANADA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION

     Respondents

     J U D G M E N T

     The application for judicial review is dismissed.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

Certified true translation

Peter Douglas

                                         Docket: A-855-97

CORAM:              DENAULT J.A.

                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                 DÉCARY J.A.

BETWEEN:

     RONALD FORTIN

     Applicant-claimant


AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     -and-

     CANADA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION

     Respondents

     Hearing held at Montréal on Thursday, May 14, 1998

     Judgment delivered at Montréal on Thursday, May 14, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:      DENAULT J.A.

                                         Date: 19980514

                                         Docket: A-855-97

CORAM:              DENAULT J.A.

                 DESJARDINS J.A.

                 DÉCARY J.A.

BETWEEN:

     RONALD FORTIN

     Applicant-claimant


AND

     ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     -and-

     CANADA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION

     Respondents

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

     (Delivered from the bench at Montréal

     on Thursday, May 14, 1998)

DENAULT J.A.

[1]      The applicant has not satisfied us that we should set aside the decision of Umpire Tremblay-Lamer confirming the decision of the Board of Referees that the claimant had not established that he was available for work.

[2]      The fact that he was exercising his right to present a grievance seeking reinstatement in employment from which he was in his view unjustly dismissed did not relieve the applicant from his obligation, if he wanted to receive unemployment insurance benefits, of showing that he was seeking employment and available for work in the meantime. By the applicant"s own admission, this was clearly not established on the evidence.

[3]      The application for judicial review must be dismissed.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

May 14, 1998

Certified true translation

Peter Douglas

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL


Date: 19980514


Docket: A-855-97

Between:

     RONALD FORTIN

     Applicant-claimant


AND

         ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     -and-

     CANADA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

     COMMISSION

     Respondents

    

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

    

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO.:                  A-855-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:              RONALD FORTIN

     Applicant-claimant

                         AND

                         ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                         -and-

                         CANADA UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

                         COMMISSION

     Respondents

PLACE OF HEARING:              Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:              May 14, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT, THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DESJARDINS AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY)

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Denault

     Dated:                  May 14, 1998

APPEARANCES:

     Ronald Fortin                  applicant-claimant

     Paul Deschênes              for the respondents

     Carole Bureau

     - 2 -

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     George Thomson              for the respondents

     Deputy Attorney General of Canada

     Ottawa, Ontario


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.