Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20021105

Docket: A-533-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 431

CORAM:        LINDEN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           LLOYD GRANT WEDOW

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                           THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA,

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                       Heard at Calgary, Alberta on November 5, 2002.

             Judgment delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta on November 5, 2002.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:                                               LINDEN J.A.


Date: 20021105

Docket: A-533-01

Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 431

CORAM:        LINDEN J.A.

NOËL J.A.

SHARLOW J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                           LLOYD GRANT WEDOW

                                                                                                                                                       Appellant

                                                                                 and

                                           THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA,

                                            THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                               Respondents

                                       REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

                     (Delivered from the Bench at Calgary, Alberta on November 5, 2002.)

LINDEN J.A.

[1]                 A decision to grant or deny an extension of time is a discretionary one. We note that in the judicial review in the court below, the appellant was successful but the reasons and the order were silent as to costs, although costs were sought. Counsel for the respondent was unable to suggest any persuasive reason why costs should not have been awarded.


[2]                 In the order on the reconsideration motion, costs were again not alluded to, although they were the basis of the motion.

[3]                 Having regard to the silence of the Motions Judge on the issue of costs, we are unable to determine whether he turned his mind to that issue. We think it appropriate to return this matter to the Motions Judge so that he may determine whether there were reasons for denying costs in the application for judicial review.

[4]                 This appeal will be allowed, the order of the Motions Judge will be set aside, an order will be made granting the extension of time and referring the matter back to the Motions Judge for reconsideration in accordance with these reasons. The appellant is entitled to his costs of this appeal and his costs of the motion for reconsideration in the Trial Division.

  

                                                                                                                                               "A. M. Linden"             

                                                                                                                                                                 J. A.                        


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

    

DOCKET:                                             A-533-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           LLOYD GRANT WEDOW v. THE SOLICITOR

GENERAL OF CANADA ET AL

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Calgary, Alberta

  

DATE OF HEARING:                       November 5, 2002

  

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Delivered from the Bench:              LINDEN, J.A.             

  

DATED:                                                November 5, 2002

   

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Lloyd Grant Wedow, Litigant in Person                                 FOR THE APPELLANT

Calgary, AB

Mr. Ron Nichwolodoff                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT

Edmonton, AB

  

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Mr. Lloyd Grant Wedow, Litigant in Person                                FOR THE APPELLANT

Mr. Morris Rosenberg                                                                 FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.