Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 19980626

Docket: A-432-97

CORAM:        MARCEAU, J.A.

                        LINDEN, J.A.

                        ROBERTSON, J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                            TAMMY DONOHUE

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                         - and -

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 1998

Judgment delivered at Vancouver, British Columbia on June 26, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:                                                                ROBERTSON, J.A.


Date: 19980626

Docket: A-432-97

CORAM:        MARCEAU, J.A.

                        LINDEN, J.A.

                        ROBERTSON, J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                                            TAMMY DONOHUE

                                                                                                                                            Applicant

                                                                         - and -

                                         THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                                                                                        Respondent

                                                    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                                                (Delivered orally from the Bench on

                                                 June 26, 1998, at Vancouver, B.C.)

ROBERTSON, J.A.

1�        Notwithstanding the learned and intelligent argument of Mr. Sayre, counsel for the applicant, we are not prepared to depart from our earlier decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Faltermeier (A-479-94). Therefore, the application must be dismissed without costs.

                                                                                    (Sgd.) "J.T. Robertson"

                                                                                                J.A.


                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 19980626

Docket: A-432-97

BETWEEN:

                              TAMMY DONOHUE

                                                                                Applicant

                                           - and -

           THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

                                                                            Respondent

                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DATED:                                              June 26, 1998

COURT NO.:                          A-432-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:               Tammy Donohue

                                                            v.

                                                            The Attorney General of Canada

PLACE OF HEARING:                   Vancouver, BC

DATE OF HEARING:                       June 26, 1998

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:    ROBERTSON, J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY:          MARCEAU, J.A.

                                                LINDEN, J.A.

APPEARANCES:

            Mr. James F. Sayre                for Applicant

            Ms. Leigh Taylor                    for Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

            Community Legal

            Assistance Society

            Vancouver, BC                        for Applicant

            Morris Rosenberg                 for Respondent

            Deputy Attorney General

            of Canada

                                                                                                                      

                      REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                                                                                                                      

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.