Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content





Date: 20000808


Docket: A-384-99



BETWEEN:

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                         Appellant

     -and-

     ALI MOHAMED ZIYADAH

                                         Respondent

     REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT

R. Orrin J. Splane

Assessment Officer


[1]      On June 29, 2000, the Court (Robertson J.A., McDonald, J.A. and Sexton, J.A.) having made a finding of mootness, dismissed the appeal with costs.

[2]      The Respondent has submitted his Bill of Costs which contains the consent and approval of the Appellant as to form and content. Counsel have indicated to the Registry that they wish the matter to be dealt with in writing.

[3]      All items claimed in the Bill of Costs falling within the amounts permitted under column III of the tariff, and being on consent of the parties, are allowed as presented. GST in the amount of $126.00 being the only disbursement claimed is allowed.

[4]      A Certificate of Assessment in the amount of $1,800.00 for Fees and $126.00 for disbursements for a total of $1,926.00 will therefore issue.


                             "R. Orrin J. Splane"

                             R. Orrin J. Splane


     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD



DOCKET:              A-384-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:          MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION v.

     ALI MOHAMMED ZIYADAH

PLACE OF HEARING:      Edmonton, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING:      August 8, 2000
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS-REASONS BY      R. ORRIN J SPLANE
DATED :              August 8, 2000

DEALT WITH IN WRITING

APPREARANCES

W. Brad Hardstaff                      For the Appellant
Phillip S. Robichaud                      For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                      For the Appellant

Snyder and Associates

Edmonton, Alberta                      For the Respondent
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.