Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20050713

Docket: A-805-00

Citation: 2005 FCA 257

Between:

ACTION BY CHRISTIANS FOR THE ABOLITION
OF TORTURE (A.C.A.T.)

Appellant

AND

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

and

MAUREEN KIDD, in her capacity as

Director General of the Charities Directorate

of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency

Respondents

ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS

MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

[1]                On May 16, 2005, we sent a letter to the appellant requiring it to file its written submissions against the respondents' bill of costs. To date, there has not been a reply to our request.

[2]                In the circumstances, the respondents' bill of costs is assessed as submitted since all of the claims are reasonable and consistent with the application of Tariff B in general.


[3]                A certificate of assessment is therefore issued in the amount of $1,575.00.

DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2005.

Signed: "Michelle Lamy"

MICHELLE LAMY

ASSESSMENTOFFICER

Certified true translation

Kelley A. Harvey, BCL, LLB


                                                                             


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                                                                             

                                                      SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT DOCKET NO.:                   A-805-00

Between:

ACTION BY CHRISTIANS FOR THE ABOLITION
OF TORTURE (A.C.A.T.)

Appellant

AND

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

and

MAUREEN KIDD, in her capacity as

Director General of the Charities Directorate

of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency

Respondents

WRITTEN ASSESSMENT OF COSTS

PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec

REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT: MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER

DATE OF REASONS:           July 13, 2005

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Davis Ward Phillips & Vineberg

Montréal, Quebec                                                                     FOR THE APPELLANT

John Sims

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                        FOR THE RESPONDENTS

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.