Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

       Date: 20020521

                                Docket: A-643-00, A-222-01 and A-302-01

                                       Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 208

CORAM:      STONE J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

ISAAC J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                    

          REDDY RAJAGOPAL CHAVALI, REDDY KRISHNAVENI CHAVALI,

                   and REDDY VENKATASUBBARAMI CHAVALI

                                                               Appellants

                                                              (Plaintiffs)

                                   and

             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA;

             HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO;

       ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

                   and THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL,

                          AND THE FOLLOWING:

                    THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA;

       LAWYERS'PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; CHARLES HARNICK;

        W.D. CHILCOTT J; J.B. CHADWICK J; DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J;

            PETER A. CUMMING J; DOUGLAS COO J; ARCHIBALD J:

      THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD; LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES; NELLIGAN-POWER;

                 MARK GEDDES; DAVID CHICK; ARTHUR AULT;

                     GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSON;

             ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION; GEORGE GATY;

             CHATEAU ROYALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC;

         LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA; PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC;

    ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA; THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK;

         ALLAN O'BRIEN; JAMES MORTON; JERRY LEVITAN; KANNY NG;

             MAJESTIC KEY MANAGEMENT LTD; SAMUEL TALBERT;

             COLETTE TALBERT; PIAZZA, BROOKS & SIDDONS;

                THE CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA;

        SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN; ANDRE BLUTEAU; MONICA CHARLES;

                     FELIX CHARLES; and KAY CHARLES

                                                              Respondents

                                                              (Defendants)

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT BY:                                                           STONE J.A.


                       Date: 20020521

                                                                                           Docket: A-643-00, A-222-01 and A-302-01

                                                                                                               Neutral Citation: 2002 FCA 208

CORAM:        STONE J.A.

LINDEN J.A.

ISAAC J.A.

BETWEEN:

                                    

          REDDY RAJAGOPAL CHAVALI, REDDY KRISHNAVENI CHAVALI,

and REDDY VENKATASUBBARAMI CHAVALI

                                                                         

Appellants

(Plaintiffs)

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA;

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

and THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL,

AND THE FOLLOWING:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA;

LAWYERS'PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; CHARLES HARNICK;

W.D. CHILCOTT J; J.B. CHADWICK J; DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J;

PETER A. CUMMING J; DOUGLAS COO J; ARCHIBALD J:

THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD; LOCKWOOD & ASSOCIATES; NELLIGAN-POWER;

MARK GEDDES; DAVID CHICK; ARTHUR AULT;

GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSON;

ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION; GEORGE GATY;

CHATEAU ROYALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC;

LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA; PEAT MARWICK THORNE INC;

ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA; THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK;

ALLAN O'BRIEN; JAMES MORTON; JERRY LEVITAN; KANNY NG;

MAJESTIC KEY MANAGEMENT LTD; SAMUEL TALBERT;

COLETTE TALBERT; PIAZZA, BROOKS & SIDDONS;

THE CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF OTTAWA;

SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN; ANDRE BLUTEAU; MONICA CHARLES;

FELIX CHARLES; and KAY CHARLES

Respondents

(Defendants)


Page 2

                     REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE COURT

(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on Tuesday, May 21, 2002)

l.       This is a motion by the appellants to present new evidence on these appeals pursuant to Rule 351 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998, which provides for the reception of new evidence in "special circumstances".

2.      Having regard to the appellants' arguments, we are not persuaded that they have brought their motion within the three-prong test developed by the jurisprudence of this Court under former Rule 1102. Thus in Frank Brunckhorst Co. v. Gainers Inc. (1993), 42 A.C.W.S. (3d) 773 (F.C.A.), MacGuigan J.A. stated:

The jurisprudence under Rule 1102 establishes that, for the admission of new evidence, the Court should be satisfied that the evidence (1) must not have been discoverable before the end of the hearing appealed from by reasonable diligence, (2) must be credible, and (3) must be practically conclusive of an issue on the appeal.

3.      The motion will therefore be dismissed.

                                                                                                                                               "A.J. STONE"

                                                                                                                                                                  J.A.


                                                    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                             A-643-00, A-222-01, A-302-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                           Reddy Rajagopal Chavali et al. v.

Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada et al.

                                                                                   

PLACE OF HEARING:                     Ottawa, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING:                       May 21, 2002

REASONS FOR ORDER :             STONE J.A.

DATED:                                                May 21, 2002


APPEARANCES:

Reddy Rajagopal Chavali                                                               FOR THE APPELLANTS

Reddy Krishna Veni Chavali

Reddy Venkatasubbarami Chavali

( On their own behalf )                                                                 

Ms. Susanne Perreira

Mr. Don Rennie                                                                              FOR THE RESPONDENTS

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL.


Ms. Ainslie Benedict                                                                       FOR THE RESPONDENTS LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, LAWYERS' PROFESSIONAL IDEMNITY COMPANY, THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD ASSOCIATES, NELLIGAN POWER, MARK GEDDES, DAVID CHICK, ARTHUR AULT, GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON, ALLAN O'BRIEN, JAMES MORTON, JERRY LEVITAN, PIAZZA BROOKS & SIDDONS, SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN, ANDRE BLUTEAU, TORONTO DOMINION BANK, ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA.

Mr. Thomas C. Barber                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENTS W.D. CHILCOOT J., B. CHADWICK J., DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J., PETER A. CUMMING J., DOUGLAS COO J. AND ARCHIBALD J.

Mr. Barry Garland                                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENTS ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, GEORGE GATY, CHATEAU ROYAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC.


Mr. Erice M. Appotive                                                                  FOR THE RESPONDENT PEAT MARVICK THORNE INC.

Mr. Larry Reimer                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENTS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AND CHARLES HARNICK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO.

Mr. Roderick Brooks                                                                     FOR THE RESPONDENTS SAMUEL TALBERT AND COLLETTE TALBERT

Ms. Ivana Baldelli                                                                           FOR THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA.

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Reddy Rajagopal Chavali                                                               FOR THE APPELLANTS

Reddy Krishna Veni Chavali

Reddy Venkatasubbarami Chavali

( On their own behalf)                          

Morris Rosenberg, Deputy

Attorney General of Canada                                                          FOR THE RESPONDENTS


HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL.

Nelligan Power LLP

Ottawa, Ontario                                                                             FOR THE RESPONDENTS LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA, LAWYERS' PROFESSIONAL IDEMNITY COMPANY, THOMAS J. LOCKWOOD ASSOCIATES, NELLIGAN POWER, MARK GEDDES, DAVID CHICK, ARTHUR AULT, GOWLING STRATHY & HENDERSON, ALLAN O'BRIEN, JAMES MORTON, JERRY LEVITAN, PIAZZA BROOKS & SIDDONS, SOLMON ROTHBART GOODMAN, ANDRE BLUTEAU, ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA


Burke-Robertson

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS W.D. CHILCOOT J., B. CHADWICK J., DOUGLAS CUNNINGHAM J., PETER A. CUMMING J., DOUGLAS COO J. AND ARCHIBALD J.

Goldberg, Kronick & Strout

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS ANDRIDGE CAPITAL CORPORATION, GEORGE GATY, CHATEAU ROYAL PROFESSIONAL BUILDING INC.

Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT LAURENTIAN BANK OF CANADA

Hamilton Appotive Callan

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT PEAT MARVICK THORNE INC.

Mr. Colin C. Taylor


Toronto Dominion Bank Legal Dept.

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT TORONTO DOMINION BANK

Piazza, Brooks & Siddons

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENTS SAMUEL TALBERT AND COLLETTE TALBERT

Ms. Ivana Baldelli

City of Ottawa Legal Dept.

Ottawa, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OTTAWA


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.