Décisions de la Cour fédérale

Informations sur la décision

Contenu de la décision



Date: 19991223


Docket: IMM-6027-98


Ottawa, Ontario, the 23rd day of December 1999

Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard


Between:


JULIETTE TEKULE YAKULANGU

KOLOSIA FAGBA


Applicants


- and -




THE MINISTER


Respondent



ORDER


     The application for judicial review of a Convention Refugee Determination Division decision dated October 20, 1998, determining that the applicants are not Convention refugees, is dismissed.


YVON PINARD_____

                                     JUDGE

Certified true translation

Peter Douglas



Date: 19991223

Docket: IMM-6027-98


Between:

JULIETTE TEKULE YAKULANGU

KOLOSIA FAGBA


Applicants



- and -




THE MINISTER


Respondent



REASONS FOR ORDER


PINARD J.:


[1]      This is an application for judicial review of a Convention Refugee Determination Division decision dated October 20, 1998, determining that the applicants, Juliette Tekule Yakulangu and her son, Kolosia Fagba, are not Convention refugees.




[2]      The Refugee Division considered the principal applicant not credible, and found that she had failed to establish, on the balance of probabilities, the crucial fact that she was the wife of Mr. Kolosia, an aide-de-camp of Field Marshall Mobutu. Furthermore, the panel has found that the principal applicant"s behaviour was inconsistent with that of a person with a well-founded fear of persecution.


[3]      The impugned decision appears to be based on both the testimony of the principal applicant and documentary evidence-exhibits P-1 to P-8-with which she was confronted.

[4]      As the issue is basically the assessment of the facts, it is well-settled that it is not for this Court to take the place of the Refugee Division where, as here, the refugee claimants fail to prove that the decision is based on an erroneous finding of fact that the tribunal made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it (see paragraph 18.1(4)(d) of the Federal Court Act). Moreover, upon reviewing all the evidence, I can conclude that the inferences drawn by this specialized tribunal were reasonable (see Aguebor v. M.E.I. (1993), 160 N.R. 315 (F.C.A.)).



[5]      The application for judicial review is accordingly dismissed.




___YVON_PINARD___

JUDGE

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

December 23, 1999

Certified true translation


Peter Douglas






FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION



NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


COURT NO.:                  IMM-6027-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:              JULIETTE TEKULE YAKULANGU

KOLOSIA FAGBA v. MCI


PLACE OF HEARING:          MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

DATE OF HEARING:          NOVEMBER 10, 1999

REASONS FOR ORDER OF PINARD J.

DATED                  DECEMBER 23, 1999



APPEARANCES:


Luc Desmarais                          FOR THE APPLICANTS


Pascale-Catherine Guay                      FOR THE RESPONDENT



SOLICITORS OF RECORD:


Luc Desmarais                              FOR THE APPLICANTS

Montréal, Quebec


Morris Rosenberg                          FOR THE RESPONDENT

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                    

 Vous allez être redirigé vers la version la plus récente de la loi, qui peut ne pas être la version considérée au moment où le jugement a été rendu.