Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 


Date: 20130221

Docket: IMM-1982-12

Citation: 2013 FC 181

Toronto, Ontario, February 21, 2013

PRESENT:    The Honourable Mr. Justice Zinn

 

 

BETWEEN:

 

JOAQUINA ELIZABETH CANO PONCE

 

 

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

 

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

 

Respondent

 

 

           REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT

 

[1]               I am not persuaded that it was unreasonable for the Board to find that the risk the applicant faces in El Salvador is a generalized rather than a personalized risk, which means that the applicant is not a person in need of protection pursuant to paragraph 97(1)(b)(ii) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27.  For that reason I am dismissing this application.

 

[2]               The starting point is for the Board to appropriately determine the nature of the risk faced by the claimant.  Here the Board did so.  It found that she was “a victim of crime” and that the threats and assault she experienced were “as a result of extortion demands.”  In my view, that is a reasonable assessment and description of the risk the applicant faced, based on the record before the Board.

 

[3]               The next step in the analysis is to compare the risk faced by the claimant to that faced by a significant group in the country to determine whether the risks are of the same nature and degree.  The Board here did so and found that “the risk faced by the claimant as a result of being the target of extortion, is faced generally by many people who are perceived to be wealthy, or own their own business in El Salvador.”  That too is a reasonable assessment based on the record.

 

[4]               Lastly, if the Board finds that the risk is a personalized one then it must examine the forward-looking nature of the risk.  In this case, having reasonably found that the risk was a generalized one, no such forward-looking analysis was required.

 

[5]               This application must be dismissed.  No question was proposed for certification.

 


JUDGMENT

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that this application is dismissed and no question is certified.

 

 

"Russel W. Zinn"

Judge


FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

 

DOCKET:                                         IMM-1982-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                        JOAQUINA ELIZABETH CANO PONCE v

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                  Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:                    February 20, 2013

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

AND JUDGMENT:                         ZINN J.

 

DATED:                                            February 21, 2013

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Diana S. Willard

 

                           FOR THE APPLICANT

Nadine Silverman

 

                           FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

DIANA S. WILLARD

Barrister & Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 

      FOR THE APPLICANT

WILLIAM F. PENTNEY

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

 

      FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.