Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Thomas v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions
Date 2012-04-19
Neutral citation 2012 FC 458
File numbers IMM-3385-12

Decision Content

 Date: 20120419

Docket: IMM-3385-12

Citation: 2012 FC 458

BETWEEN:

 

LEONIE MARIA THOMAS

 

 

 

Applicant

 

and

 

 

 

THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

 

 

 

Respondent

 

 

 

 

 

          REASONS FOR ORDER

PHELAN J.

 

[1]               These are the brief reasons for the Order granting the stay of deportation which was issued yesterday.

 

[2]               There is a significant factual point in issue on this motion which impacts the serious legal issue raised. The Applicant claims to have filed a spousal sponsorship H&C application in a timely manner. If accurate the Applicant would, arguably, be entitled to the benefit of a Ministerial policy which precludes her removal while the H&C application is being considered.

 

[3]               The resolution of this point may be somewhere in the mysteries of Canada Post who delivered the application to CIC Vegreville approximately three months after alleged mailing. The resolution may be elsewhere but time did not permit a proper exploration of the facts either through cross-examination or further affidavit evidence.

 

[4]               A deportation in these circumstances would, in reality, render the H&C application moot as the Applicant by virtue of the separation imposed by deportation would no longer qualify for the spousal sponsorship.

 

[5]               The balance of convenience favours the Applicant as it flows from the first two issues.

 

[6]               This case is somewhat similar to Terhemba Thomas Shase v The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness 2011 FC 418 and I adopt Justice Lemieux’s approach to the issue of whether to grant a stay.

 

[7]               As I will also be deciding the Leave Application, the Applicant should know that this decision to grant a stay was “close to the line”. The granting of leave is not in any way certain. The Court will expect to see further and better evidence if the Applicant persists in the claim of a timely finding of her H&C.

 

“Michael L. Phelan”

Judge

 

Toronto, Ontario

April 19, 2012

FEDERAL COURT

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD

 

 

DOCKET:                                          IMM-3385-12

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:                          LEONIE MARIA THOMAS v

                                                            THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:                    Toronto, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:                      April 18, 2012

 

REASONS FOR ORDER:               PHELAN J.

 

DATED:                                             April 19, 2012

 

 

 

APPEARANCES:

 

Kweku Ackaah-Boafo

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

 

Sybil Thompson

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

 

Kweku Ackaah-Boafo

Barrister & Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 

FOR THE APPLICANT

Myles J. Kirvan

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR THE RESPONDENT

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.