Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




Date: 20001123


Docket: IMM-5839-99


BETWEEN:

     SUNDAY BUNMI AKINSOTO

     Applicant


     - and -




     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent




     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

HANSEN J.

[1]      This is an application for judicial review of the November 24, 1999 decision of W.A. Sheppit, Minister's Delegate, that the applicant is a danger to the public pursuant to paragraph 46.01(1)(e) of the Immigration Act, R.S.C., c. I-2 (the "Act").

[2]      The applicant, a citizen of Nigeria, entered the United States in 1979 or 1981 and was there illegally until 1988 when he obtained registered alien status under an amnesty program. In 1993, he was convicted for importing heroin for which he served an 18 month term of imprisonment. He was deported by the United States authorities to Nigeria in 1998. His spouse and children still reside in the United States.

[3]      The applicant states that upon his arrival in Nigeria he was detained and tortured because of his religious activities in that country prior to leaving for the United States. He subsequently fled Nigeria and arrived in Canada in June 1999.

[4]      The applicant, travelling on a Nigerian passport, attempted to enter Canada as a visitor on the basis of his registered alien status in the United States. He was detained for questioning and subsequently charged under paragraph 94(1)(b) of the Act. While being questioned, he recanted his wish to enter as a visitor, and indicated he wanted to be close to his family. He also indicated he wished to claim refugee status as he was afraid to return to Nigeria. He plead guilty to the charge under the Act and was subsequently issued a conditional Deportation Order.

[5]      By letter dated October 7, 1999, Citizenship and Immigration Canada informed the applicant that it intended to request an opinion from the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration that he was a danger to the public pursuant to paragraph 46.01(1)(e) of the Act. He was provided with the material which was being submitted for consideration by the Minister. In response, submissions on behalf of the applicant were forwarded for consideration by the Minister's Delegate.

[6]      On November 24, 1999, the Minister's Delegate issued his opinion that the applicant constituted a danger to the public. No reasons were provided for the decision. As a consequence, the applicant's refugee claim was not referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board and he was deported to Nigeria.

[7]      One of the grounds for judicial review advanced on behalf of the applicant is that he was denied procedural fairness in not being provided with the reasons for the decision of the Minister's Delegate,

[8]      The facts of the present case are very similar to those in Navarro v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2000] F.C.J. No. 1496 (FCTD). The issue before the Court, as in the present case, was whether reasons are required when an opinion is issued under paragraph 46.01(1)(e) of the Act. In that case, following a discussion with respect to the analytical framework regarding the need for reasons, Pelletier J. held "[a]s a result, given the importance of the decision for the individual and the fact that the decision is subject to judicial oversight, I find that reasons are required to be given."

[9]      I agree with the reasons of Pelletier J. in Navarro and accordingly conclude that in the present case the applicant was denied procedural fairness.

[10]      For these reasons, the application for judicial review will be allowed and the danger opinion dated November 24, 1999 will be set aside.

[11]      Neither party submitted a question for certification.

     ORDER

[12]      The application for judicial review is allowed and the danger opinion dated November 24, 1999 is set aside.

     "Dolores M. Hansen"

     J.F.C.C.

Toronto, Ontario

November 23, 2000

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

                                                

COURT NO:                  IMM-5839-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:              SUNDAY BUNMI AKINSOTO

     Applicant

                     - and -

                     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                     AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

DATE OF HEARING:          WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2000
PLACE OF HEARING:          TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:              HANSEN J.

DATED:                  THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2000

APPEARANCES BY:           Mr. Dariusz Wroblewski
                         For the Applicant
                        
                     Mr. Martin Anderson

                    

                         For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:      Laurence Cohen

                     Barrister & Solicitor

                     50 Richmond Street East, Suite 101

                     Toronto, Ontario

                     M5C 1N7

                    

                         For the Applicant

                     Morris Rosenberg

                     Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                         For the Respondent

                         FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


                                 Date: 20001123

                        

         Docket: IMM-5839-99

                         Between:


                         SUNDAY BUNMI AKINSOTO

Applicant



                         - and -




                         THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                            

Respondent




                        

        

                         REASONS FOR ORDER

                         AND ORDER

                            

                        

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.