Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19990730


Docket: IMM-6093-99

BETWEEN:

     HENRY CORREDOR SERRANO


Applicant


- and -


THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION


Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

ROTHSTEIN J.

[1]      In this judicial recision of a decision of a panel of the Refugee Division the applicant claims a well-founded fear of persecution by the police in Colombia because of his homosexuality. While the panel found that homophobia is widespread in Colombia, and results in discrimination, it found there was no serious possibility of the applicant being persecuted. The documentary evidence indicated that overt acts of violence and serious abuse occurred to the most visible of homosexuals. Based on the applicant"s evidence and the documentary evidence the panel concluded that the applicant did not fit into the most visible group of homosexuals. The panel also observed that although the applicant alleged difficulties beginning in 1993 he did not leave Colombia until the fall of 1996, that he went to Italy on a student visa and came to Canada in October 1997 on a Canadian student visa and did not make a refugee claim until late in January 1998, shortly before his student visa was to expire. The panel found that this delay impacted negatively on the credibility of his story.

[2]      The panel concluded that the applicant"s actions were consistent with the view that the difficulties encountered were isolated instances and were contradictory to a well-founded fear of persecution at the hands of the police in Colombia.

[3]      I can find no error in the panel"s reasoning. The panel was entitled to have regard for the long delay between the time the applicant"s difficulties arose in Colombia and his refugee application in Canada in assessing the credibility of his claim. The panel also quite properly considered the applicant"s activities in concluding that they were not consistent with his alleged fear at the hands of the police. The panel acknowledged that homosexuals were not without discrimination in Colombia but that the applicant did not fit any group who might have serious risk of persecution. The applicant"s activities and the documentary evidence support this conclusion.

[4]      The judicial review must be dismissed.

                                 "Marshall Rothstein"

     JUDGE

TORONTO, ONTARIO

July 30, 1999


     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-6093-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:                      HENRY CORREDOR SERRANO
                             - and -
                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                            

DATE OF HEARING:                  THURSDAY, JULY 29, 1999
PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              ROTHSTEIN J.

DATED:                          FRIDAY, JULY 30, 1999

APPEARANCES:                      Mr. Kirk J. Cooper

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                             Ms. Marianne Zoric

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Kirk J. Cooper

                             Barrister & Solicitor

                             120 Carlton Street

                             Suite 215

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M5A 4K2

                                 For the Applicant

                              Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General of Canada

                                 For the Respondent

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date:19990730

                        

         Docket: IMM-6093-99

                             Between:

                             HENRY CORREDOR SERRANO
                                      

     Applicant

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                            

        

                                                                             REASONS FOR ORDER

                            

                            

        


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.