Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                     Date: 19990510

                                     Docket: IMM-2292-99

BETWEEN:      VLADIMIR FERTIH

     -and-

     ANNA BROVKINA

     -and-

     ANASTASIA FERTIH

     Applicants

     AND

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     -and-

     MS. JOSÉE GROULX C/O CENTRE IMMIGRATION CANADA

     CANADA IMMIGRATION CENTRE

     Respondents

     REASONS FOR ORDER

ROULEAU J.

[1]      This is an application for a stay of a deportation order that is to be executed May 13, 1999.

[2]      The Applicants, citizens of Kazakhstan, claimed refugee status in January 1996 after having entered Canada from the United States of America in November of 1995.

[3]      The refugee claim was refused in October of 1997; Judicial Review was denied on the merits in October of 1998. A further application under PDRCC was also negative.

[4]      The female applicant gave birth to a child in Canada in June of 1998.

[5]      An application under Section 114(2) of the Immigration Act seeking Ministerial exemption was filed January 18, 1999. A letter indicating that the exemption was not warranted was provided on April 28, 1999.

[6]      Application for Judicial Review of the April 28, 1999 decision was filed May 5, 1999 but not yet determined.

    

[7]      In April of 1999, the applicants were advised to attend at Immigration Canada on April 20 in order to indicate when they would leave Canada in accordance with the outstanding removal direction.

[8]      Previously in November of 1998, while making inquiries at Immigration Canada, they indicated that if they were to be deported, they wished to be returned to the United States.

[9]      They were subsequently advised that the child could not accompany them to the United States but they persist even today to be deported to the United States rather than Kazakhstan.

[10]      The main submission for granting the stay of the Deportation Order relates to the uncertainty surrounding the child who is a "Canadian citizen".

[11]      I am not satisfied that the test as maintained in the jurisprudence allows for the Court to exercise its discretion favourably.                         

[12]      The application is dismissed.

     Paul U.C. Rouleau

                                         Judge

MONTREAL, QUEBEC

May 10, 1999

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD

COURT FILE NO.:      IMM-2292-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:      VLADIMIR FERTIH

     -and-

     ANNA BROVKINA

     -and-

     ANASTASIA FERTIH

     Applicants

     AND

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

     IMMIGRATION

     -and-

     MS. JOSÉE GROULX C/O CENTRE

     IMMIGRATION CANADA/CANADA

     IMMIGRATION CENTRE

     Respondents

PLACE OF HEARING:      Montreal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:      May 10, 1999

REASONS FOR ORDER OF ROULEAU J.

DATED:      May 10, 1999

APPEARANCES:

Mr. David Farrell      for the Applicants

Mr. Michel Synnott      for the Respondents

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

GREY CASGRAIN

Montreal, Quebec      for the Applicants

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montreal, Quebec      for the Respondents


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.