Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content






Date: 20000908


Docket: IMM-4583-00



BETWEEN:

     MARIA ABANTO ROJAS

     Applicant

     - and -



     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent



     REASONS FOR ORDER

BLAIS J.


[1]      This is a motion for a stay of the deportation order of the applicant.

[2]      On July 4, 2000 a departure order was delivered by hand to the applicant.

[3]      On August 3, 2000 the departure order turned automatically into a deportation order.

[4]      A direction to report for removal was provided by hand to the applicant on August 17, 2000. This direction to report specified that the removal of the applicant from Canada was scheduled for Friday, September 1, 2000.

[5]      The applicant failed to give the Court a convincing explanation as to why she waited so long to bring this last minute application.

[6]      On June 29, 2000, an agreement was reached between the parties.

[7]      On July 4, 2000, a new departure order reflecting the agreement between the parties was issued. The order provided the applicant with thirty (30) days to voluntarily leave Canada with her daughter.

[8]      The applicant unsuccessfully tried to leave Canada for the United States on July 28, 2000.

[9]      On August 30, 2000, the applicant filed an application for leave and for judicial review of the decision of Mr. Bob LeDuc, immigration officer, dated August 17, 2000, wherein the officer issued a direction to report for the removal.

[10]      In my view, the agreement between the parties was not in any way related to a departure for the United States.

[11]      Given that the applicant failed to leave Canada as she agreed to do, Canada Immigration had no other option than to issue the direction to report for Peru, as it did.

[12]      The applicant failed to demonstrate that there is a serious issue to be tried.

[13]      The applicant also failed to bring any evidence that she will suffer any irreparable harm if she is deported to Peru.

[14]      For these reasons, this application for a stay is dismissed.



                         Pierre Blais

                         Judge

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

September 8, 2000

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.