Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980923


Docket: IMM-3448-98

BETWEEN:

     TAHEREH SHAKER

         Applicant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

GILES, A.S.P.:

[1]      On August 10th the applicant attempted to file her application record in the last hour of the last day and failed.

[2]      On August 12th a motion for an extension of time was filed supported by an affidavit of the applicant's process server evidencing the delay and exhibiting, correctly in my view, only the cover page of the application record to show that the record had been prepared. Because no evidence of an arguable case for leave was filed that motion for an extension was dismissed with leave to reapply.

[3]      The new application is now before me supported by an affidavit exhibiting the very record for which leave to file is sought. This affidavit would, in my view, in the ordinary case have been ordered returned to the applicant. As the affidavit and the notice of motion are both integral parts of the motion record there would have been no motion before the Court after the return.

[4]      In a covering letter, the applicant's counsel states that he filed the application record as it was the only way to show an arguable case. It may well be that all of the evidence of an arguable case is to be found in certain documents and affidavits in the application record. Those documents and affidavits, however, have an independent existence and duplicates could have been exhibited to affidavits and the affidavits could have been incorporated with explanatory representations in the motion record.

[5]      Rather than deny an extension for a second time I have perused the application record and, while pages appear to be missing, conclude that some evidence of an arguable case for leave exists. I am therefore not ordering the motion record returned and will extend time.

ORDER

     The time for filing the applicant's application record is extended to October 15, 1998.

                         "Peter A.K. Giles"

                                 A.S.P.

TORONTO, ONTARIO

September 23, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-3448-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      TAHEREH SHAKER

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                            

CONSIDERED AT TORONTO, ONTARIO UNDER THE PROVISION OF RULE 369.

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY:                      GILES, A.S.P.

DATED:                          WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1998

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Raoul Boulakia

                             Barrister and Solicitor

                             45 Saint Nicholas Street

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M4Y 1W6

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                             Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                             

                                 For the Respondent


                            

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date: 19980923

                        

         Docket: IMM-3448-98

                             Between:

                             TAHEREH SHAKER

     Applicant

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                             AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                            

            

                                                                                     REASONS FOR ORDER

                                 AND ORDER

                            


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.