Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


T-115-97


IN THE MATTER OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT,

R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29


AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the

decision of a Citizenship Judge


AND IN THE MATTER OF


CHUNG CHUEN WONG


Appellant.


REASONS FOR ORDER

     Let the attached certified transcript of my Reasons for Order delivered orally from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on October 8, 1997, be filed to comply with s. 51 of the Federal Court Act.

                             Howard I. Wetston

                        

                                 Judge

     Court File No. T-115-97

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

B E T W E E N:

     CHUNG CHUEN WONG

     Applicant

     - and -

     CITIZENSHIP ACT

     Respondent

BEFORE:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE WETSTON

HELD AT:      The Federal Court, 330 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario.

DATE:      October 8th, 1997.

REGISTRAR:      R. CLAPHAM

     REASONS FOR DECISION

A P P E A R A N C E S:

MS. K. GRONOFSKY      The Applicant

P. LARGE, ESQ.      Amicus Curiae

     HIS LORDSHIP: On the matter before me is the appeal of Chung Chuen Wong and the grounds for appeal is primarily based upon knowledge of Canada under Section 5(1)(e) of the Citizenship Act. The matter before me is trial de novo or hearing de novo and obviously Mr. Wong in not satisfying the Citizenship Judge has made an effort to attempt to satisfy this Court that he has sufficient knowledge of Canada.

     There is a lot to know, Mr. Wong, and I did note that while the questions from your counsel were obviously questions that you worked on together, which I think is obviously appropriate in these kinds of matters, I did note that the questions from Mr. Large, the Amicus Curiae were of course not worked on together and as such I paid particular attention to the answers to those questions, with all due respect to your counsel.

     It seems to me that you have obviously met all the other requirements since your application for citizenship was turned down on the basis of Section 5(1)(e), and I am satisfied that you have now made sufficient effort to at least obtain sufficient knowledge of Canada to meet that requirement. In this case I therefore will allow your appeal.

     CERTIFIED CORRECT,

    

     Lennox T. Brown, F.I.P.S.

     Verbatim Reporter


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD

COURT FILE NO.: T-115-97

STYLE OF CAUSE: Citizenship Act

v. Chung Chuen Wong

PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario

DATE OF HEARING: October 8, 1997

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE WETSTON DATED: October 30, 1997

APPEARANCES

Karen Granofsky FOR THE APPELLANT

Peter K. Large THE AMICUS CURIAE

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Henry K. Hui & Associates FOR THE APPELLANT Barristers and Solicitors

Richmond Hill, Ontario

Peter K. Large THE AMICUS CURIAE Barrister and Solicitor

Toronto, Ontario

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.