Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980716


Docket: IMM-4548-97

BETWEEN:

     MANJIT KAUR GORAYA,

     Applicant,

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION,

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL, J.

[1]      The claimant alleges a well founded fear of persecution on the grounds of political opinion and membership of a particular social group, specifically her family.

[2]      Respecting the claim of persecution on the basis of membership in a particular social group, there is a paucity of analysis and indeed no precise decision provided on this issue. On the record there is ample evidence of continuing police contact with family members in India. I find the decision is unresponsive to this evidence.

[3]      Accordingly, under section 18.1(4)(d) of the Federal Court Act, I find that the panel's decision in this case was made without regard for the material before it. Thus, the decision is set aside and the matter is referred to a differently constituted panel for redetermination.

                             (Sgd.) "Douglas Campbell"

                                     Judge

Vancouver, British Columbia

July 16, 1998

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:          IMM-4548-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:      Manjit Kaur Goraya

                 v.
                 The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
PLACE OF HEARING:                      Vancouver, BC
DATE OF HEARING:                      July 14, 1998

REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER OF THE COURT BY:

CAMPBELL, J.

DATED:                              July 16, 1998

APPEARANCES:

     Paul Sandhu                          for Applicant
     Sandra Weafer                      for Respondent
    

    

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     Paul Sandhu                          for Applicant
     Kang & Company
     Morris Rosenberg                      for Respondent

     Deputy Attorney General of Canada

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.