Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content




         Date: 20000602

     Docket: IMM-3643-99

Between:

     ROSA ISABEL QUINTANA CONTRERAS

     Applicant

     - and -

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent



     REASONS FOR ORDER



TREMBLAY-LAMER J.:


[1]      This is an application under subsection 82.1(1) of the Immigration Act1 (the Act) for judicial review of a decision by the Convention Refugee Determination Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the Refugee Division) that the applicant is not a Convention refugee mainly because her narrative lacked credibility.
[2]      Moreover, the Refugee Division held that even if the applicant's allegations were accepted, they would fail to establish a reasonable chance of persecution.

    

     Page: 2

[3]      With respect to the finding of lack of credibility, although the applicant claims that the Refugee Division erred in assessing the facts, I do not believe that this is true. The contradictions the panel found involved crucial elements of the claim, and the inferences it drew supported the finding that the applicant lacked credibility.
[4]      The applicant also maintains that the Refugee Division breached the principles of procedural fairness by not confronting her about the contradictions. I do not agree. The contradictions stemmed from personal documents she provided. The panel was not required to confront her in that type of situation.
[5]      With respect to finding that there was no reasonable chance of persecution, the panel found that it was not the applicant but her husband, no longer carrying out his duties and presently in Mexico, who is the main target.
[6]      The applicant maintains that the Refugee Division overlooked the fact that part of her fear arose from the fact that Dincote considered her a terrorist sympathizer.
[7]      Although the claim does mention that the applicant and her husband were considered sympathizers, no finding was made with respect to the applicant. Only the husband was targetted, and a warrant was issued solely for his arrest.

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

TRIAL DIVISION

     Date: 20000602

     Docket: IMM-3643-99

BETWEEN:

     ROSA ISABEL QUINTANA CONTRERAS

     Applicant

     - AND -



     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent





REASONS FOR ODER

1     




















         Page: 3

                                                                                    

[8]      I cannot find any error of fact or of law to justify my intervention.
[9]      For these reasons, the application for judicial review is dismissed.


     Danièle Tremblay-Lamer

                                         JUDGE

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC

June 2, 2000



Certified true translation



Peter Douglas
















                





FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD



COURT FILE NO.:              IMM-3643-99
STYLE OF CAUSE:          ROSA ISABEL QUINTANA CONTRERAS

     Applicant

                      AND

                     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND

                     IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:          Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING:          June 1, 2000

REASONS FOR ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE TREMBLAY-LAMER


DATED:                  June 2, 2000

APPEARANCES:

Manuel Centurion (articling student)                          for the applicant
Marie-Claude Demers                              for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Michel LeBrun

Montréal, Quebec                                  for the applicant

Morris Rosenberg

Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                                  for the respondent     

__________________

1 R.S.C., 1985, c. I-2

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.