Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 19981204

     Docket: IMM-408-98

Ottawa, Ontario, the 4th day of December 1998

Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Pinard

Between:

     Kulwinder Singh NIJJAR

     Applicant

     - and -

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA

     Respondent

     ORDER

     The application for judicial review of the decision dated December 24, 1997, by the Convention Refugee Determination Division, which determined that the applicant is not a Convention refugee, is dismissed.

                             YVON PINARD

                             JUDGE

Certified true translation

M. Iveson

     Date: 19981204

     Docket: IMM-408-98

Between:

     Kulwinder Singh NIJJAR

     Applicant

     - and -

     MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

     AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

PINARD J.:

[1]      The application for judicial review concerns a decision dated December 24, 1997, by the Convention Refugee Determination Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the panel), which determined that the applicant is not a Convention refugee.

[2]      First, preferring the relevant documentary evidence to the testimony of the applicant, the panel was not convinced that the applicant had an objective fear of persecution and, second, it found that there was an internal flight alternative in India.

[3]      After hearing the representatives of the parties and reviewing the evidence, I am of the view that the Refugee Division, which is a specialized tribunal, acted in accordance with the principles set out in Zhou v. M.E.I. (July 18, 1994), A-492-91 and Rasaratnam v. Canada (M.E.I.), [1992] 1 F.C. 706 (C.A.), when it held that the applicant"s testimony was implausible, and when it determined, especially considering the applicant"s particular circumstances, that there was no reasonable chance or serious possibility that he would be persecuted if he settled in India outside the Punjab. As I am accordingly of the view that the panel could reasonably have concluded as it did, the application for judicial review is dismissed.

[4]      There is no question here to be certified.

                             YVON PINARD

                                     JUDGE

OTTAWA, ONTARIO

December 4, 1998

Certified true translation

M. Iveson

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     TRIAL DIVISION

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT NO.:      IMM-408-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:      KULWINDER SINGH NIJJAR v. MINISTER OF

     CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

PLACE OF HEARING:      MONTRÉAL

DATE OF HEARING:      NOVEMBER 17, 1998

REASONS FOR ORDER OF PINARD J.

DATED:      DECEMBER 4, 1998

APPEARANCES:

ÉVELINE FISET          FOR THE APPLICANT

JOCELYNE MURPHY          FOR THE RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

ÉVELINE FISET          FOR THE APPLICANT

MONTRÉAL

MORRIS ROSENBERG          FOR THE RESPONDENT

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.