Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20011003

Docket: IMM-4484-01

Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 1091

BETWEEN:

                                                                 KAZIM CIRAHAN

                                                                                                                                                       Applicant

                                                                                 and

                                                  THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                                                              AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER

NADON J.

[1]                 Although Ms. Rochester made very forceful arguments with respect to the existence of a serious question, I need not decide this issue.

[2]                 After reviewing the evidence and considering the arguments made by both sides, I have not been persuaded that irreparable harm will result if I do not grant the Applicant the stay which he seeks to obtain.

[3]                 Thus, as the Applicant has not met the relevant test, as enunciated by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toth v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, (1988) 86 N.R. 302, his application for a stay of execution of the deportation order made against him is dismissed.

                      Marc Nadon                    

                          Judge                        

Montreal, Quebec

October 3, 2001


                                                  

                    FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                  TRIAL DIVISION

Date: 20011003

Docket: IMM-4484-01

BETWEEN:

KAZIM CIRAHAN

                                                                                      Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                  Respondent

                                                                                                                              

                                      ORDER AND

                          REASONS FOR ORDER

                                                                                                                              


                                                                 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                                                              TRIAL DIVISION

                                           NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                          IMM-4484-01

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                        KAZIM CIRAHAN

                                                                                                                                                                                   Applicant

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                                               Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                                  Montreal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:                                    October 1, 2001

ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER OF

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NADON

DATED:                                                             October 3, 2001

APPEARANCES:

Ms. Vonnie E. Rochester                                                                            FOR APPLICANT

Mr. François Joyal                                                                                       FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Ms. Vonnie E. Rochester                                                                            FOR APPLICANT

Morris Rosenberg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Montreal, Quebec                                                                                       FOR RESPONDENT


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.