Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19980219


Docket: IMM-1551-97

BETWEEN:

     EJAZ HUSSAIN

     Applicant

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

McGILLIS, J.

[1]      The applicant has challenged by way of judicial review a decision of a visa officer that he did not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada as a permanent resident.

[2]      In her assessment of the applicant, the visa officer awarded him a total of sixty-eight points. As a result, the applicant was ineligible for admission as a permanent

resident by two points.

[3]      A review of the evidence in the record indicates that the visa officer awarded the applicant ten points for education, on the basis that he had only completed secondary school. In her affidavit, the visa officer stated as follows:

             He confirmed that he completed only higher secondary school in Pakistan. He provided a diploma from the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education to confirm this education. As he did not complete a post secondary program of any kind, I awarded him 10 points for education, to reflect the completion of secondary school only.             

[4]      In his application for permanent residence, the applicant indicated that he had attended a high school, and had obtained a secondary school certificate. He further indicated that he had attended the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, and had completed two years of college in 1976.

[5]      I am satisfied, on the basis of the evidence in the record, that the visa officer erred in law by misapprehending the applicant's evidence concerning his education, on the basis that she improperly equated his college studies with a secondary school education. I have therefore concluded that my intervention in this matter is warranted.

[6]      The application for judicial review is allowed. The decision dated March 7, 1997 of the visa officer P.A. Fitzgerald 1997 is quashed. The matter is remitted to a different visa officer for redetermination. The case raises no serious question of general importance.

"D. McGillis"

Judge

Toronto, Ontario

February 19, 1998

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET:                          IMM-1551-97

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      EJAZ HUSSAIN

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP

                             AND IMMIGRATION

DATE OF HEARING:                  FEBRUARY 19, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:              McGILLIS, J.

DATED:                          FEBRUARY 19, 1998

APPEARANCES:                 

                             Mr. Yossi Schwartz

                            

                                 For the Applicant

                             Ms. Bridget O'Leary

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:         

                             Roach, Schwartz & Associates

                             688 St. Clair Avenue West

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M6C 1B1

                                 For the Applicant

                             George Thomson

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                  For the Respondent


                                                                            FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
                                             Date: 19980219
                                             Docket: IMM-1551-97
                                                                          BETWEEN:
                                                                 
                                             EJAZ HUSSAIN
                                                  Applicant
                                             - and -
                                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
                                             AND IMMIGRATION
                                                  Respondent
                                            
                                                         
                                                                                                                      REASONS FOR ORDER
                                            

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.