Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

    



Date: 19991006


Docket: IMM-4554-99


BETWEEN:

     ALEXANDER LATYCHKEVITCH


Applicant



- and -





THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION


Respondent




     REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

CAMPBELL J.

[1]      On this application for stay of the deportation order herein, I grant the application on the terms and for the reasons set out below.

[2]      I find that the serious question to be tried in the judicial review herein is whether s. 32.02(1) of the Immigration Act offends sections 6(e) and 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in that, by virtue of s.32.02(1) a departure order becomes a deportation order without a consultative process being engaged within which Charter concerns are canvassed.

[3]      I find the irreparable harm to the applicant to be that he might be put into danger if he is removed to the Ukraine, these conclusions being based on the CRDD"s finding of fact that "the claimant faced a number of incidents of discrimination [in the Ukraine] due to his Jewish nationality and religion from his youth until he came to Canada".

[4]      I also find that the balance of convenience rests with the applicant.

     ORDER

[5]      Accordingly, I hereby stay the deportation order herein until the question of leave is determined on the judicial review application herein.

[6]      I also order that the applicant be allowed to amend the judicial review application herein to provide particulars of the Charter argument made. I also order that the amended application be filed not later than 4:30 p.m. on October 8, 1999, and I grant the respondent 14 days thereafter to file any reply considered necessary.

    



[7]      As the matter of administration, I hereby direct that the application for leave on the judicial review application herein not be placed before a judge for consideration until the amended application is filed, if any, and the amended reply is filed, if any, by the times set out.

                                 "Douglas R. Campbell"

     Judge

Toronto, Ontario

October 6, 1999



























                                            

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-4554-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:                      ALEXANDER LATYCHKEVITCH

                                                     Applicant

                             - and -

                                            

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION                                     

     Respondent

                            

DATE OF HEARING:                  TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999
PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO
REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              CAMPBELL, J.

DATED:                          WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1999

APPEARANCES:                      Mr. Steve W. Rosenbaum

                                 For the Applicant

                             Ms. Paige Purcell

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Rosenbaum, McKay, Glady

                             Barristers and Solicitors

                             257 Danforth Avenue

                             Toronto,Ontario

                             M4K 1N2

                                 For the Applicant

                              Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                 For the Respondent

                                

                             FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


                                 Date: 19991006

                        

         Docket: IMM-4554-99


                             Between:


                             ALEXANDER LATYCHKEVITCH

     Applicant

                             - and -



                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent




                    

                            

            

                                                                             REASONS FOR ORDER


                                                                     

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.