Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     Date: 19971125

     File: T-771-96

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1997

PRESENT:      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RICHARD

BETWEEN:      IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,

     R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision

     of a Citizenship judge,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF

     NICOLAS BANNOUT,

     Appellant.

     JUDGMENT

     The appeal is allowed.

                                         John D. Richard

                                         Judge

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

     Date: 19971125

     File: T-771-96

Between:

     IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,

     R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision

     of a Citizenship judge,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF

     NICOLAS BANNOUT,

     Appellant.

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RICHARD J.

[1]      This is an appeal from the decision of a Citizenship judge dated March 15, 1996, denying the appellant's application for citizenship under subsection 5(1) of the Act because he was unable to prove that he was domiciled in Canada.

[2]      The appellant, who is 70 years old, and his son, Charles Bannout, testified before me. He was lawfully admitted to Canada for permanent residence on December 11, 1992, and applied for citizenship on November 24, 1995.

[3]      Since his arrival in Canada in April 1991 he has lived in his son's home in Boisbriand, Québec. After his wife died in September 1993 he returned to Syria to reclaim property, and was out of the country for 338 days. He obtained a returning resident permit.

[4]      Although he is not employed in Canada he is sponsored by his son.

[5]      Based on the evidence given before me, I am satisfied that the appellant is settled in Canada, that his one absence from Canada was temporary, that he was away longer than intended and that he maintained the intention of returning to Canada. He satisfied the requirements of the Act concerning residence.

[6]      In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed.

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC                              John D. Richard

THIS 25th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1997                      Judge

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Date: 19971125

     File: T-771-96

Between:

     IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,

     R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision

     of a Citizenship judge,

     AND IN THE MATTER OF

     NICOLAS BANNOUT,

     Appellant.

    

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

    

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO:          T-771-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:          IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-29,
         AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the decision of a Citizenship judge,

         AND IN THE MATTER OF

         NICOLAS BANNOUT,

     Appellant

PLACE OF HEARING:          Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:          November 24, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RICHARD

DATE OF REASONS FOR JUDGMENT:      November 25, 1997

APPEARANCES:

     Nicolas Bannout          for himself

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     George Thomson

     Deputy Attorney General

     of Canada          for the applicant

     Nicolas Bannout

     Montréal, Quebec          for himself

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.