Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


IMM-4300-96

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 1997

PRESENT:          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LUTFY
BETWEEN:          KANDOLA GIAN SINGH,

     Applicant

             AND:
             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA,

     Respondent

         Application for judicial review to have the Court quash the Tribunal"s decision of October 30, 1996 and send the matter back to a panel otherwise constituted.


[Section 82.1 of the Immigration Act]


O R D E R

         The application for judicial review is dismissed.

                                                              Allan Lutfy
                                                              Judge

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.


IMM-4300-96

BETWEEN:          KANDOLA GIAN SINGH,

     Applicant

             AND:
             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA,

     Respondent


REASONS FOR ORDER

LUTFY J.

     The applicant contends that the Refugee Division (the tribunal) rejected the findings of the orthopedist"s report and did so without giving valid reasons. I do not agree.

     The medical expert expressed the opinion that the applicant"s scars seemed to him to be compatible with his statements. The tribunal took the report into account but, in questioning the applicant"s credibility, concluded that his scars were not caused in the circumstances as he had described them. It was the tribunal"s task to assess the applicant"s credibility. The doctor could conclude that the applicant"s scars were consistent with his version without necessarily binding the tribunal to accept its plausibility.

     Counsel for the applicant submits that the doctor was not obliged to conclude that torture was the only cause of the scars: Thurairajah v. The Minister of Employment and Immigration, [1994] F.C.J. No. 322. The tribunal did not require such proof in this case.


     Furthermore, my reading of the transcript of the hearing convinces me that the tribunal did not commit any error in its assessment of the evidence that might warrant my intervention. The tribunal"s reasons in regard to the applicant"s credibility are clear and explicit.

     Accordingly, the application for judicial review shall be dismissed.

                                                              Allan Lutfy
                                                              Judge

Montréal, Quebec

October 1, 1997

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

Federal Court of Canada

File No. IMM-4300-96

BETWEEN


KANDOLA GIAN SINGH,

     Applicant

             - and -

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA,

     Respondent


REASONS FOR ORDER


FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

FILE NO.                  IMM-4300-96
STYLE:                  KANDOLA GIAN SINGH

     Applicant

                 AND:
                 THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION OF CANADA,

     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:          Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING:          September 30, 1997

REASONS FOR ORDER OF LUTFY J.

DATED:                  October 1, 1997

APPEARANCES:

Jean-François Fiset                  for the applicant
Édith Savard                      for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Blain, Fiset & Associés,

Montréal, Quebec                  for the applicant
George Thomson             

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Ottawa, Ontario                  for the respondent
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.