Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20040210

Docket: IMM-1236-03

Citation: 2004 FC 216

Toronto, Ontario, February 10th, 2004

Present:           The Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell                                  

BETWEEN:

                                                       CHARLENE CLAIRMONT and

ELIJAH EHOIZE ESPINOZA

                                                                                                                                                      Applicants

and

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                   Respondent

                                               REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

[1]                 In the present case, the Applicant claims refugee protection as a spousal abuse survivor from Trinidad and Tobago.


[2]                 The Applicant first personally appeared before the IRB on October 30, 2002 at which time the hearing of her refugee claim was scheduled for December 11, 2002; she was advised she had the right to retain counsel. By letter dated November 20, 2002, a lawyer whom the Applicant consulted wrote to the IRB and asked that the hearing be adjourned to certain dates in February/March 2002 as, assuming he would be retained on legal aid, he was unable to appear on December 11, 2002.

[3]                 By telephone message to the lawyer from an IRB administrator on December 10, 2002, the lawyer was advised that his application for an adjournment was denied as the hearing was "peremptory".

[4]                 In my opinion, the failure of the IRB to grant the adjournment request is a breach of due process. On the record, there is absolutely no evidence that the Applicant was guilty of causing any delay in her application proceeding to hearing, and there is no evidence of any reason for why the hearing date should have been considered peremptory. It is important to note that until the day before the hearing, the Applicant was provided with no notice that the matter was considered peremptory, thereby forcing her to proceed with her hearing without the assistance and guidance of counsel. In my opinion, the IRB's conduct and in dealing with the Applicant's right to counsel was entirely unwarranted and unreasonable.


                                                                            ORDER

THIS COURT ORDERS that

Accordingly, I set aside the IRB's decision and refer the matter to a differently constituted panel for redetermination.                         

            "Douglas R. Campbell"

line

                                                                                                                                                               J.F.C.                          


FEDERAL COURT

                              NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

DOCKET:                                                    IMM-1236-03

STYLE OF CAUSE:                                   CHARLENE CLAIRMONT and

ELIJAH EHOIZE ESPINOZA

                                                                                                                                                       Applicants

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                                                                                                     Respondent

PLACE OF HEARING:                           TORONTO, ONTARIO

DATE OF HEARING:                               FEBRUARY 10, 2004

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER BY :                                  CAMPBELL J.

DATED:                                                        FEBRUARY 10, 2004

APPEARANCES:

Mr. Robert Young

FOR APPLICANTS

Ms. Alexis Singer

FOR RESPONDENT

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Sullivan, Festeryga

Barrister and Solicitor

Hamilton, Ontario

FOR APPLICANTS

                                                                                   

Morris Rosenberg                                                                          

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

Toronto, Ontario

FOR RESPONDENT


                          FEDERAL COURT

TRIAL DIVISION

                                            

Date: 20040210

Docket: IMM-1236-03

BETWEEN:

CHARLENE CLAIRMONT and

ELIJAH EHOIZE ESPINOZA

                                                                                         

                                                                        Applicants

and

THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                                                                     Respondent

                                                                           

REASONS FOR ORDER

AND ORDER

                                                                           

                                                                                         


 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.