Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content


Date: 19990430


Docket: IMM-2666-98

BETWEEN:

     GODFREY BASTIAMPILLAI and

     CHRISTINE BASTIAMPILLAI and

     GAVIN AUGUSTINE BASTIAMPILLAI

     (by his litigation guardian) and

     TREVIN CALLISTUS BASTIAMPILLAI

     (by his litigation guardian) and

     DAMIEN SYLVESTER BASTIAMPILLAI

     (by his litigation guardian)

     Applicants

     - and -

     THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

     Respondent

     REASONS FOR ORDER

TREMBLAY-LAMER J.:

[1]      This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the Convention Refugee Determination Division (CRDD) that the Applicants are not Convention refugees.

[2]      The Applicants are Tamil citizens of Sri Lanka, who lived in Colombo. They claim to have a well-founded fear of persecution for reasons of nationality, political opinion and membership in a particular social group.

[3]      The adult male claimant operated an airline ticket business out of his home. He claims that on "many occasions [his] house was searched by police, [his] children woken from their sleep, their beds turned and closets ransacked." On two occasions, he alleges, the security personnel found large amounts of money, which they took and did not return: 285,000 rupees the first time and 412,000 rupees the next. Following these events, he claims he was arrested and detained for suspicion of being a fund-raiser for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam. Upon his release from detention, he was threatened with death if he told anyone what had happened.

[4]      The Applicants had visited Canada before and the adult male applicant, who speaks three languages, had personal knowledge of the travel industry. When they departed for Canada, they surrendered their passports to an agent. The principal claimant states that he did this because he was confused and scared following the death of his father and his recent release from detention.

[5]      The CRDD rejected the Applicant"s testimony as implausible and not credible. At the heart of the decision, the Tribunal stated the following:

             Since the panel does not find the claimants to be credible or trustworthy on key portions of their evidence, then it does not accept that the adult male claimant was ever arrested or detained by the Sri Lankan authorities as he claims. Nor does the panel accept that the security forces personnel ever took large sums of money from the claimants. The panel, therefore, finds that there was no basis to the claimants" allegations that they face a well-founded fear of persecution if they were returned to Sri Lanka today.1             

[6]      The Applicants submit that there was no valid basis for the Refugee Division to make the implausibility findings. Having reviewed the implausibilities identified by the Board, I believe that the findings were open to it on the evidence. If confronted with the same evidence, I may have concluded differently. However, the fact that I could have reached a different conclusion does not allow me to intervene in the absence of an overriding error. There was no such error in this case.

[7]      The negative credibility finding is determinative of the claim, thus I do not need to address the Board"s finding regarding state protection.

[8]      The application for judicial review is dismissed.

[9]      Neither counsel recommended a question for certification.

                         "Danièle Tremblay-Lamer"

                                 Judge

TORONTO, ONTARIO

April 30, 1999.

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                          IMM-2666-98

STYLE OF CAUSE:                  GODFREY BASTIAMPILLAI and

                             CHRISTINE BASTIAMPILLAI and

                             GAVIN AUGUSTINE BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian) and

                             TREVIN CALLISTUS BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian) and

                             DAMIEN SYLVESTER BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian)

                             and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

DATE OF HEARING:                  THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 1999

PLACE OF HEARING:                  TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR ORDER BY:              TREMBLAY-LAMER J.

DATED:                          FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 1999

APPEARANCES:                      Ms. Toni Schweitzer

                            

                                 For the Applicants

                            

                             Mr. Godwin Friday

                                 For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:              Jackman, Waldman & Associates

                             Barristers & Solicitors

                             281 Eglinton Ave. E.

                             Toronto, Ontario

                             M4P 1L3

                                 For the Applicants

Solicitors of Record cont'd...              Morris Rosenberg

                             Deputy Attorney General

                             of Canada

                                 For the Respondent

                    

                              FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                                 Date: 19990430

                        

         Docket: IMM-2666-98

                             Between:

                             GODFREY BASTIAMPILLAI and

                             CHRISTINE BASTIAMPILLAI and

                             GAVIN AUGUSTINE BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian) and

                             TREVIN CALLISTUS BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian) and

                             DAMIEN SYLVESTER BASTIAMPILLAI

                             (by his litigation guardian)

                            

                                 Applicants

                             - and -

                             THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

                        

     Respondent

                    

                            

            

                             REASONS FOR ORDER             

                            

    

__________________

1      Applicant"s Record at 12.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.