Federal Court Decisions

Decision Information

Decision Content

     T-2696-80

B E T W E E N:

     SMITH, KLINE, & FRENCH LABORATORIES LIMITED,

     SMITYH, KLINE & FRENCH CANADA LTD.,

     GRAHAM JOHN DURANT, JOHN COLIN EMMETT

     and CHARON ROBIN GANELLIN

     Plaintiffs

     - and -

     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Defendant

     AMENDED REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER

GILES, A.S.P.:

     The motion by the Attorney General of Canada before me, was for directions as to whether or not a document included in the Crown's list of documents in the Tax Court of Canada appeal no. 95-1077(IT) ("document 73") is a document subject to the confidentiality order of this Court, in action T-2696-80. At the commencement of the hearing, counsel for the respondent to the motion, the plaintiffs in T-2696-80, asked that I deal first with certain claims for privilege made in connection with questions asked in cross-examination of an affiant of an affidavit filed in support of this motion. At that stage, it appeared to me that the purpose of the affidavit was to support an argument that document 73 had been acquired in a manner which would mean it was not subject to the confidentiality order. After some two hours, counsel for the Crown indicated that should the document sealed pursuant to the confidentiality order of the Associate Chief Justice, in this Court be substantially similar to document 73, the Crown would agree that the confidentiality order applied to document 73. I then questioned the relevance of proceeding to determine the issue of privilege. Counsel for the respondent indicated that the conduct of those acting for the Crown would be relevant to, inter alia, the directions he was seeking to remove counsel for the Crown. For such direction, he would be obliged to show some discreditable conduct.

     After the lunch break, counsel for the Crown sought to have me declare moot the request for directions removing counsel, alleging it was in the jurisdiction of the Tax Court of Canada. However, before this matter could be determined, counsel agreed that I should open the sealed document and compare it with document 73, I did so.

     Both documents were copies, four pages long, apparently of the same document, apparently signed by the same people on the same date. The sealed document had the following additions on the front page.

     1.      At the top left, a sticker with the following legend:
             "This document is subject to                         
             the order of confidentiality of
             the Federal Court of Canada
             dated February 14, 1985, action

             number T-2696-80."

     2.      In the centre of the top margin, a "capital letter D in a circle" both in pencil.
     3.      At the top right in red ink the following has been hand-written:

             "D-146

             to be

             sealed

         as confidential"

     4.      At the bottom left, a Federal Court of Canada stamp indicating the document to be an exhibit filed as "D-146 at Ottawa on September 20, 1985".

     When these additions were explained to counsel for the Crown, he agreed that document 73 was subject to the confidentiality order of this Court.

     After further discussion, the matter of privilege and the directions sought by the respondent's counsel were adjourned sine die to be brought on by either party on 2 weeks notice.

O R D E R

     It is found that document numbered 73 in the proceedings of the Tax Court of Canada is a document to which the confidentiality order of this Court applies.

     Matters of privilege and the directions sought by counsel for the respondent are adjourned sine die to be brought on by either party on 2 weeks notice.

                         "Peter A.K. Giles"

                                 A.S.P.

Toronto, Ontario

November 3, 1997

     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

COURT NO:                  T-2696-80

STYLE OF CAUSE:              SMITH, KLINE, & FRENCH LABORATORIES LIMITED, SMITYH, KLINE & FRENCH CANADA LTD., GRAHAM JOHN DURANT, JOHN COLIN EMMETT and CHARON ROBIN GANELLIN

    

                     - and -

                     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

DATE OF HEARING:          MAY 12, 1997

PLACE OF HEARING:          TORONTO, ONTARIO

AMENDED REASONS

FOR ORDER AND ORDER BY:      GILES, A.S.P.

DATED:                  NOVEMBER 3, 1997

APPEARANCES:

                     Mr. Robert W. Staley

                         For the Plaintiffs

                     Mr. Roger Leclaire

                         For the Defendant

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

                     BENNETT JONES VERCHERE

                     Barristers & Solicitors

                     One First Canadian Place

                     34th Floor, P.O. Box 130

                     Toronto, Ontario

                     M5X 1A4

                         For the Plaintiffs

                      George Thomson

                     Deputy Attorney General

                     of Canada

                         For the Defendant

                     FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

                     Court No.:      T-2696-80

                     Between:

                     SMITH, KLINE, & FRENCH

                     LABORATORIES LIMITED, SMITYH,

                     KLINE & FRENCH CANADA LTD.,

                     GRAHAM JOHN DURANT,

                     JOHN COLIN EMMETT

                     and CHARON ROBIN GANELLIN

     For the Plaintiffs

                     - and -

                     THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

                     OF CANADA

                    

     For the Defendant

                     AMENDED REASONS FOR

                     ORDER AND ORDER

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.