Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal Canada

Decision Information

Decision Content

Canada Appeals Office on Bureau d’appel canadien en

Occupational Health and Safety santé et sécurité au travail

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

CANADA LABOUR CODE

PART II

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

 

 

 

 

 

Sharon Brown

 

applicant

 

 

and

 

 

Canada Custom and Revenue Agency

 

employer

 

 

 

 

____________________________

Decision No.: 04-033

September 20, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

This case was decided by Douglas Malanka, appeals officer.

 


- 2 -

 

 

  • [1] On April 7th, 2003, Ms. Sharon Brown, Customs Inspector appealed the decision of no danger issued by health and safety officer K. Manella, following her refusal to work of March 31st, 2003.

  • [2] Ms. Brown’s statement of the refusal to work was: “Refuse to sort the Customs E311 cards because of the unknown pathogens on the cards and the fear that by this type of extended contact I will contaminate myself, my surroundings or counters parts.The cards have been in contact with respiratory secretions and body fluids of passengers – healthy or unhealthy.And there are germs that can survive on different surfaces for at least 2 - 3 hours ie. Corona virus. See: www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/transcripts/t030329.htm

  • [3] Ms. Brown advised the Canada Appeals Office on Occupational Health and safety on September 16, 2004, that she no longer wanted to proceed with her two complaints (2003-32 and 2003-33) and she withdrew her appeal.

  • [4] Based on the facts provided to me in this case, it appears that this appeal was withdrawn and I therefore confirm that the file on this matter is closed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________

Douglas Malanka

Appeals Officer

 

 

 

 

 


SUMMARY OF DECISION

 

 

 

 

Decision No. 04-033

 

Applicant: S. Brown

 

Employer: Canada Customs and Revenue Agency

 

Key Words: Decision, refusal to work.

 

Provisions:

 

Code: 129(7)

Regulations:

 

 

 

Summary:

 

The applicant appealed a decision of no danger issued by a health and safety officer, following a refusal to work. The applicant further withdrew his appeal and the appeals officer closed the file.

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.