Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal Canada

Case No.: 891-2-1

Decision No.: CAO-07-031

 

 

 

CANADA LABOUR CODE

PART II

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

 

 

 

Randy Fingland and Jurgen Deagle

appellants

 

 

and

 

 

Parks Canada Agency

respondent

 

________________

September 11, 2007

 

 

 

This matter is decided by Appeals Officer Douglas Malanka.

 

 

For the appellant

Mr. Andrew Raven, Counsel, Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne & Yazbeck

 

For the respondent

Mr. Kirk Lambrecht Counsel, Department of Justice

 

• [1] This case concerns appeals made to an Appeals Officer pursuant to subsection 129(7) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II (the Code) by Park Warden Randy Fingland and Park Warden Jurgen Deagle on June 19, 2001 and June 21, 2001 respectively.The two Park Wardens employed by Parks Canada Agency at Jasper National Park appealed the decision of Health and Safety Officer (HSO) Jack Almond made on June 12, 2001 following his investigation of their refusals to work.HSO Almond decided that, while an element of danger existed for the employees, the danger was a normal condition of employment.

 

• [2] According to his statement on the Human Resources Development Canada Refusal To Work Registration Form, form LAB/TRAV 795, Park Warden Randy Fingland refused to work on June 6, 2001 for the following reason:

 

Parks Canada has suspended my duty as a peace officer. They still require me to wear a peace officer uniform and drive a peace officer vehicle. The uniform and vehicle put me at risk because the public still thinks I am a peace officer.

 

• [3] According to his statement on the Human Resources Development Canada Refusal To Work Registration Form, form LAB/TRAV 795, Park Warden Deagle refused to work on June 6, 2001 for the following reason:

 

Refuse to wear park warden uniform and drive vehicles with warden markings due to risk associated with public perception of peace officer.

 

• [4] Following his investigation of their refusals to work, HSO Almond advised Park Wardens Fingland and Deagle on June 18, 2001 that they were not entitled to continue to refuse to work under section 128(1) of Part II.HSO Almond wrote in his written decision:

 

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 128(2) OF THE CANADA LABOUR CODE PART II. (sic) THE DANGER REFERRED TO IN SUBSECTION 128(1) IS A NORMAL CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT. THEREFORE THE UNDERSIGNED CANADA HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFICER CONSIDERS THAT THE RIGHT TO REFUSE DANGEROUS WORK IS NOT PERMITTED.

 

• [5] Andrew Raven, on behalf of the appellant, requested that the hearing of these appeals scheduled for July 8, 2002, be deferred pending the final outcome of the judicial review application in respect of the decision of Appeals Officer Serge Cadieux in the case of Parks Canada Agency versus Douglas Martin and Public Service Alliance of Canada, Decision No. 02-009, dated May 23, 2002.

 

• [6] On September 5, 2002 , Appeals Officer Douglas Malanka confirmed for parties that the hearing was so deferred.

 

• [7] On July 16, 2007, following the decision rendered on the appeal of Parks Canada Agency versus Douglas Martin and Public Service Alliance of Canada, Decision No. CAO‑07-015, dated May 8, 2007, Michel Parent, A/Case Management Officer, Canada Appeals Office on Occupational Health and Safety wrote to parties on July 16, 2007 to schedule a hearing to hear the appeals by Parks Warden Fingland and Deagle.

 

• [8] On August 17, 2007 , Andrew Raven wrote to confirm that Appellants Fingland and Deagle wished to withdraw their appeals before an Appeals Officer.

 

• [9] Considering the above and having reviewed the file, these appeals are withdrawn and this case is closed.

 

 

 

_________________

Douglas Malanka

Appeals Officer
SUMMARY OF APPEALS OFFICER DECISION

 

 

Decision CAO-07-031

 

Appellant Randy Fingland and Jurgen Deagle

 

Respondent Parks Canada Agency

 

Provisions

 

Canada Labour Code 129(7)

Keywords Danger, normal danger, peace officer uniform, peace officer marked vehicles, withdrawal.

 

SUMMARY

 

On June 19, 2001 and June 21, 2001 respectively Park Wardens Randy Fingland and Jurgen Deagle appealed the health and safety officer’s finding in respect of their refusals to work. However, on August 17, 2007, Andrew Raven, Counsel, wrote on behalf of Appellants Fingland and Deagle to confirm that they wished to withdraw their appeals before an Appeals Officer. The case is therefore closed.