56 result(s)
-
51.
Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1978 v. Hackman - 2022 ONCAT 143 - 2022-12-20
CAT Decisions - DecisionCompliance with Governing Documents
Compliance with Settlement Agreement
Indemnification or Compensation
Noise
Odour
Other Type of Nuisance, Annoyance or Disruption
I did not consider anything communicated within that topic for the purpose of the hearing or this decision and it will not form part of the record in this case. Records request [7] In the course of the hearing of this matter, Mr. Hackman submitted a request for records. [...] Both parties did file video recorded on phones which are intended to reproduce the noise being experienced. [...] It is not possible to give any weight to these recordings. The audio quality is not very good and even if it was, a cell phone recording provides no information about the level of the recording or where the sounds are coming from.
-
52.
Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 105 v. Lucien Aubé et al. - 2024 ONCAT 148 - 2024-09-25
CAT Decisions - DecisionIndemnification or Compensation
Smoke and/or vapour
Moreover, CCC 105 reviewed the video recordings from its security cameras and confirmed that Mr. Gauthier smoked in and around the common elements in February and March 2024, despite the fact that rule 28 prohibits smoking in these areas.
-
53.
Russell v. York Condominium Corporation No. 50 - 2021 ONCAT 103 - 2021-11-04
CAT Decisions - DecisionAccess to Records
Adequacy of Records
Entitlement to Records
Fees, Costs, Penalties
[6] When condominium owners request records, they make a formal Request for Records under the Regulation. Each Request for Records may include multiple individual records that are being requested. [...] The records that were eventually provided are adequate records for the IGTA agreement. [...] I conclude that the March 6, 2021 minutes combined with the agreement constitute an adequate record. Record Request 4.07 - Privacy Policy for CCTV camera videos recorded by the corporation, including all legal opinions from all law firms received or considered by the board relating to installation or compliance with Private
-
54.
Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2082 et al. v. Momoh et al. - 2023 ONCAT 133 - 2023-09-19
CAT Decisions - DecisionCompliance with Governing Documents
Indemnification or Compensation
Noise
The Applicants provided a copy of the video recording of this incident. This incident resulted in separate complaints from at least eight other residents on the floor but constitutes only one of the 34 incident reports.
-
55.
Waterloo North Condominium Corporation No. 37 v. Baha et al - 2024 ONCAT 131 - 2024-08-26
CAT Decisions - DecisionCompliance with Governing Documents
Indemnification or Compensation
Noise
Pets and Animals
He is the only one who seems to have presumed the dogs to be aggressive; the video stills submitted by WNCC 37 of Mr. Murphy and the dogs which purport to suggest aggressive behavior do the contrary. [...] As in Rahman, it was clear on the record that such an award was sought. It could not have been a surprise to WNCC 37, given this and the evidence submitted, that a claim for damages would be made. [...] Both were cases arising from records requests, which distinguish them from this case and limits their relevance.
-
56.
Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 570 v. Cetin et al. - 2023 ONCAT 116 - 2023-08-18
CAT Decisions - DecisionCompliance with Governing Documents
Noise
Parking and Storage
Vehicles
A video recording of the incident was entered as evidence. [11] I accept the undisputed and credible evidence of MTCC 570 and of Mr. Cetin’s neighbour.